Viewing cable 09HOCHIMINHCITY452, VO VAN KIET'S EMBATTLED LEGACY, ONE YEAR AFTER HIS PASSING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Reference ID	Created	Released	Classification	Origin
09HOCHIMINHCITY452	2009-06-05 11:31	2011-08-26 00:00	UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY	Consulate Ho Chi Minh City

VZCZCXRO1484
OO RUEHDT RUEHPB
DE RUEHHM #0452/01 1561131
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O P 051131Z JUN 09
FM AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5839
INFO RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 3815
RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH CITY PRIORITY 6075
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HO CHI MINH CITY 000452 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/MLS AND DRL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON PGOV SOCI VM
SUBJECT: VO VAN KIET'S EMBATTLED LEGACY, ONE YEAR AFTER HIS PASSING 
 
REF: (A) 08 HCMC 360, (B) HANOI 412, (C) 08 HCMC 543 
 
HO CHI MIN 00000452  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
¶1. (SBU) Summary:  One year after the death of reform-minded 
former prime minister Vo Van Kiet, supporters say his ideas are 
largely ignored by the current Party leadership even as it tries 
to co-opt his legacy.  Kiet is particularly revered in Ho Chi 
Minh City (HCMC), where he earned his revolutionary credentials 
and, as HCMC Party Secretary, developed his reformist ideas. 
Elites in HCMC, however, dismiss current Prime Minister Nguyen 
Tan Dung's efforts to use Kiet's memory to revive Dung's own 
image as a reform-oriented leader.  Instead, they speak of a 
continuing vacuum in the reformist camp because nobody today has 
Kiet's combination of revolutionary and reform credentials. 
Despite their cynicism, HCMC intellectuals (including many who 
recently raised an unprecedented public outcry against Party 
policy on bauxite development) say Kiet's ideas and 
outspokenness continue to inspire them to continue his path 
towards reform and a more democratic Vietnam.  End summary. 
 
Jostling to Inherit a Legacy 
---------------------------- 
¶2. (SBU) In Vietnamese culture death anniversaries are important 
milestones, with responsibility for performing annual rituals to 
the departed's heir.  So Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung raised 
eyebrows in HCMC on May 28 when his office instructed all major 
print and online newspapers in Vietnam, two days before former 
Prime Minister Vo Van Kiet's death anniversary, to publish a 
piece by Dung commemorating that occasion.  HCMC press contacts 
told the Consulate that the media had received a direct order 
from Dung's office that his article receive front-page coverage, 
and that no other articles on Kiet could be published before 
his. 
 
¶3.  (SBU) The prime minister's article was little more than the 
typical communist leadership encomium, praising Kiet as an 
ardent liberation fighter, great renovator, national 
reconciliation pioneer and economic reformist.  But once the 
essay was published, the proverbial flood gates opened. 
Numerous articles, both in the official press and the blog 
community, portrayed Kiet as the last of the "doi moi 
generation" of Vietnamese leaders:  a great reformer, 
reconciler, but most of all, a democracy supporter who had the 
unique position and credentials to publicly advocate reforms. 
 
¶4. (SBU) Political observers in HCMC told us they interpreted 
Dung's move as an attempt "to redeem his image as a reform 
advocate" and, in particular, to appeal to the reform-minded 
intellectuals who have recently come out en masse against the 
GVN's policy of bauxite excavation in the Central Highlands.  A 
reliable contact told us that given how little respect for 
Kiet's wishes and ideas Dung and the GVN have shown over the 
last year, the PM's trick has proven "counter-productive" with 
HCMC intellectuals and failed to win the Prime Minister any 
points. 
 
Out of Sight, Out of Mind? 
-------------------------- 
¶5. (SBU) Kiet's supporters divide his achievements into two 
phases:  his reforms while in power and his ideas after stepping 
down.  While Kiet is revered by most (if not all) for the 
policies he put in motion while in power, reformers complain the 
GVN has ignore his subsequent ideas for reform.  For example, in 
the run-up to the 10th Party Congress, Kiet wrote a widely 
circulated letter that urging the Party to democratize itself 
and familiarize the society with democratic practices.  He also 
advised that the 15-member Politburo return decision-making 
power to the 150-member Central Committee.  Just prior to his 
passing, Kiet voiced concern against a hasty expansion of the 
city of Hanoi but top Party leaders didn't waver.  On May 29, 
the National Assembly, under Party's pressure, approved the 
decision. 
 
¶6. (SBU) More recently, Kiet's death wishes are also being 
ignored.  In his publicized will, he specifically urged Vietnam 
not to name any streets after him, yet authorities in the 
central coast province of Quang Ngai officially named a street 
in Van Tuong town (near the newly opened Dung Quat oil refinery) 
in his memory, with Prime Minister Dung in attendance at the 
naming ceremony.  In his will, Kiet expressed that he did not 
want any kind of shrine dedicated to him.  Yet on May 31, the 
Standing Party Committee of Kiet's home province of Vinh Long 
announced that it would build a memorial structure.  (Comment: 
For many, this would, of course, evoke memories of Le Duan's 
decision to embalm Ho Chi Minh and build a mausoleum, ignoring 
Ho's instruction that his remains be cremated.  End comment.) 
 
A Vacuum Yet to be Filled 
------------------------- 
¶7. (SBU) Just who will be the heirs to Vo Van Kiet's legacy 
remains to be seen, but on May 30, "a small group of family and 
 
HO CHI MIN 00000452  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
close friends" commemorated the first death anniversary of the 
former Prime Minister, according to someone who was present. 
Noticeably absent from this firsthand account was any mention of 
GVN or Party officials, who turned out in droves for Kiet's June 
2008 funeral (reftel).  Kiet's passing creates a vacuum to be 
filled, wrote Nguyen Trung, a reform advocate and popular 
internet journalist.  Trung speaks for many when he says that 
Kiet "went away too early," highlighting the fact that the 
reform camp now lacks a true leader.  According to another HCMC 
intellectual, Kiet and other "doi moi leaders" possessed a 
potent combination of revolutionary credentials and reformist 
ideas that uniquely qualified them to challenge the Party status 
quo.  This contact observed that Vietnam's next generation (by 
virtue of age, if nothing else) must find another road. 
 
Comment: 
-------- 
¶8. (SBU) Kiet's enduring legacy appears to be not just the Doi 
Moi policies he helped put into place, but the inspiration and 
encouragement he had ignited among intellectuals and the general 
public alike -- today, many of the leading petitioners against 
the bauxite excavation consider themselves Kiet's disciples. 
While dismissive of PM Dung's efforts to co-opt Kiet's legacy, 
many Consulate contacts nevertheless believe the recent level of 
outspokenness and public debate on major social issues 
(including democracy) is irreversible.  Kiet apparently 
initiated, to quote a blog entry to commemorate him, a path that 
"he wanted others to continue on after him."  While nobody is 
yet able to replace Kiet in the driver's seat, many 
intellectuals still believe the vehicle of reform is ultimately 
heading in the direction he had desired.  End cQment. 
 
¶9. (U) This cable was coordinated with Embassy Hanoi. 
DICKEY