Thứ Tư, 30 tháng 11, 2011

The Road to Naypyidaw: What Hillary Clinton Will See in Burma

As U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton makes her historic visit to Burma from Nov. 30 to Dec. 2, she will be touring two vastly different cities. Clinton, the first U.S. Secretary of State to visit the isolated nation in more than half a century, first stops in Naypyidaw, the country's capital. The vast, surreal city, which means “the abode of the kings,” did not exist when Clinton's predecessor John Foster Dulles went to Burma, now known officially as Myanmar, back in 1955, before the country's military junta wrested control from a civilian government. In fact, Naypyidaw was only unveiled six years ago when a startled civil servant corps was told to pack their bags and head north from Burma's former capital, Rangoon. One cavalcade of trucks started on the road to the as-yet-unnamed city at the astrologically inspired time of 11 in the morning on Nov. 11 . Burma's then ruling junta was known to factor the stars into their leadership plans.
No one is absolutely sure why Burma's generals, who earlier this year handed over power to a semi-civilian government still packed with army men, left bustling, dilapidated Rangoon. The official answer was that Rangoon had gotten too crowded. But other theories abound. The country's kings had a legacy of building grand capitals, like Ava and Mandalay, to preserve their legacy. The junta's chief Than Shwe, a reclusive general who is said to be a student of the country's royal history, may have wanted to add Naypyidaw to that royal building tradition.
Naypyidaw, which is situated on a vast plain overlooked by the Shan Hills in central Burma, is also far more bunkered than Rangoon, the southern trading port that was coaxed into relevance by the colonial British. For a clutch of battle-hardened generals, the fortress-like quality of their planned city—with a vast military zone inaccessible to normal citizens and honeycombed with tunnels and other martial trappings—must have been reassuring. Back when cyclone Nargis tore through lower Burma's Irrawaddy Delta in 2008, killing some 140,000 people, Naypyidaw was left unscathed. As the generals dallied on providing emergency aid to victims—a delay that cut short lives—speculation circulated in Burma that Western powers might invade to force the junta to save its beleaguered citizens. The rumors were, of course, fanciful. But surely the generals felt more immune to attack in their fortress capital than in Rangoon, which is more easily approachable by sea. (However, members of one ethnic group, which has on occasion raised a rebel militia, still roam the Shan Hills, proving that even Naypyidaw cannot be isolated from the ethnic troubles that continue to bedevil Burma.)
When I first visited Naypyidaw in 2008, it was a vast, empty place with all the charm of a down-market American housing estate spread across a space so vast it takes an hour to cross by car. Street-sweepers languidly brushed dust off the six-lane highways. There was no need for them to get out of the middle of the road because so few cars traveled the spotless thoroughfares. A couple years later, I drove a juddering car up the new highway from Rangoon, passing young girls working in road-construction crews who were paid only $1.50 per day—if they were lucky enough to collect their wages. I expected that Naypidaw would have developed somewhat since then, but apart from a shopping center with video arcade and a massive parliament building, the city still felt vacant. Today the highways are still largely devoid of cars. Built just a few years ago, the civil servants' housing blocks—color-coded by government ministry—have weathered badly, their paint jobs bleached and left to decay, like victims of the sub-prime crisis. A Russian company will eventually build the country's first subway system in Naypyidaw, if local media is to be believed.
If this is the generals' dreamscape, then Naypyidaw speaks to peculiar priorities. There are several golf-courses, an air-conditioned enclave for penguins at the zoo and a scattering of immense government ministries marooned amid scrubland.  But across the city, few people wander about. No one is here unless they have to be. Many civil servants have left their families back in Rangoon. Embassies have refused to move. Even the generals' children and grandchildren, the pampered princelings whose antics have shocked the Burmese populace, prefer to live in Rangoon. Naypyidaw has little nightlife to offer. On maps sold in the capital, the entire military zone is blank.
The new capital does boast a towering replica of Rangoon's Shwedagon pagoda, the nation's holiest site. When I visited the Naypyidaw pagoda's construction site a few years back, I saw a row of children, some who looked no older than in first grade, carrying piles of rocks on stretchers. The straggle of youngsters was lined up like some surreal parody of a monastic processional. By the time the Naypyidaw Buddhist site was finished, real monks roamed the fancy new prayer halls with lavish gilt swirls. But the place had, as one pilgrim whispered to me, “no heart.”
By contrast, Rangoon, where Clinton will arrive on Dec. 1, is full of soul. A chaotic conurbation of some 5 million people, Burma's largest city was during British colonial times a polyglot metropolis with state-of-the-art infrastructure. Burma back then was one of the richest regions in Asia, blessed with fertile land and many natural resources. Following the military takeover in 1962, Rangoon, now known officially as Yangon, was preserved in amber for decades as the country isolated itself from the world. The nationalist regime ejected many Indian and Chinese residents in favor of the majority Bamar ethnicity, and the economy degenerated into one of the poorest in the world. But even today, amid the golden pagodas, there are hints of Rangoon's multicultural past: mosques and a Tamil temple, brick churches and a historic synagogue.
The city had not aged entirely gracefully; residents are occasionally killed when buildings collapse or naked power-lines electrocute passersby. Unlike Naypyidaw, which is bathed in 24-hour light, Rangoon suffers from chronic power cuts and wonky wiring. Walking at night, without the aid of streetlights, it's easy to trip over slabs of broken pavement or fall into uncovered sewers. One day I narrowly missed a chunk of concrete falling off a building near me. Instead, the piece of balcony slammed into a car next to me, smashing the windshield. The faces of decaying apartment blocks are striped with brightly colored strings to which plastic bags are attached, an ancient pulley system for those living on the higher floors. Nevertheless, Rangoon thrums with life, with people rushing to board the so-called “big belly” Chevrolet buses of mid-20th century vintage or lining up at street stalls to buy packets of betel nut and computer manuals that promise to teach “Latest Word Perfect Tips 1995.”
Because Rangoon was abandoned by the generals, majestic government ministry buildings now stand empty, colonial-era hulks surrounded by waist-high grass and flitting bats. Another dilapidated building in the former capital is the lakeside residence of democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, whom Clinton is scheduled to meet. New grass has been placed outside her crumbling villa, where she was kept under house arrest for the better part of two decades until her release last year. In a further sign of hospitality, a stretch of tarmac on a road passing a famous pagoda has been freshly pitched. The pagoda is temporarily housing a tooth believed to come from the Buddha himself that is on loan from China. Everyday, crowds of pilgrims line up to see the holy relic—and, as they wait, admire the stretch of new road.
Beyond the new sod and tarmac, Rangoon is beginning to boom in other ways. First-time visitors may still see a time-warped city, with peeling paint, mildewed walls and a proliferation of charmingly hand-painted signs. Most everyone, man or woman, wears the traditional Burmese sarong, known as the longyi. But Rangoon is changing, in large part because of a flood of foreign investment from Asian neighbors who do not impose economic sanctions on Burma. New construction—albeit mostly covered in bamboo scaffolding, as opposed to the more modern metal, and with nary a crane in sight—dots the city. Billboards decorate traffic circles and intersections, hawking either local or Asian products because of the Western sanctions. In a sign of the level of development Rangoon is striving for, a giant billboard advertises a Samsung “twin cooling system refrigerator—an appliance that will only work with plentiful generator back-up. The advertisement for the fridge looms near where a Japanese photojournalist was killed when the military crushed a monk-led protest in 2007, gunning down pro-democracy demonstrators and unarmed clerics. Elsewhere, I see billboards displaying gleaming white toilets and instant coffee. There is a new chandelier shop called “super power.”
Remarkably, as my 1960s-era taxi bumps along the road, my phone picks up the occasional wifi signal. New coffee shops offer lattés and biscotti. And some of the colonial-era ministries and government buildings that have been rotting in the tropical sun are now slated for re-development. Public indignation has ensued because at least one reportedly has been handed over to a regime crony so he can turn it into a five-star hotel. The income gap between the majority of Burmese, who struggle just to feed themselves, and the country's new rich, their pockets lined by the selling off of Burma's natural treasures, is yawning ever wider. At the airport, air-conditioned Land Rovers swoop in with “VVIP” emblazoned on the windshield. I wonder who counts as a mere VIP.
Rangoon's center of gravity still remains at Shwedagon, the enchanting golden spire that rises above the city. Clinton will visit this holy site. Her plans, however, do not encompass a stop at the Shwedagon knock-off in Napyidaw. Indeed, her schedule in the new capital only includes meetings with government officials, including new President Thein Sein, a retired general and former junta member who heads the quasi-civilian government. But in Rangoon, in addition to Suu Kyi, Clinton is scheduled to convene with a wide swathe of Burmese, from political activists and former political prisoners to civil-society representatives and members of Burma's disaffected ethnic minorities, who make up roughly 40% of the nation's population.
One person Clinton will also likely be meeting is Zarganar, a famous comedian who was jailed after he dared to distribute food to victims of cyclone Nargis and publicized to the foreign media the generals' paltry aid efforts. When I meet Zarganar in Rangoon this time, he expresses optimism about the reforms Burma is currently undergoing, particularly the political softening that prompted Clinton's visit. “My feeling about Burma is that we are in a 3D time,” he says. “Right now it's a new dawn in Burma. We must work hard to make sure the new dawn turns into a new day. But we have to make sure we don't return to the old dark.”

Read more: http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2011/11/30/the-road-to-naypyidaw-what-hillary-clinton-will-see-in-burma/#ixzz1fD69jjX2

New Evidence That Heart Attacks Can Begin In The Mouth

A growing body of data shows just how important oral hygiene is – not just healthy teeth, but also to avoid life-threatening medical events like heart attacks and strokes. Brushing is a must. But people should also have their teeth cleaned professionally, at least twice a year.
Share on Facebook print
Experts say two brushings a day are crucial (bark) Experts say two brushings a day are crucial (bark)

*NEWSBITES
DIE WELT/Worldcrunch
A research team from Veterans General Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan presented a study at the annual assembly of the American Heart Association that shows conclusively why good dental care isn’t just about having a nice smile. It can also help people prevent strokes and heart attacks.
The team analyzed the health insurance data of 100,000 people in an average time frame of seven years. When the research began, none of those participating in the study had cardiovascular disease. One half of the test subjects went to have their teeth cleaned professionally at least once a year, while the other half brushed their teeth regularly but did not go for cleanings.
The result? Those who had their teeth cleaned professionally had 13% less chance of stroke, and 24% less chance of a heart attack. Concretely, this means that good dental care is as important to good health as exercise.
Also presented at the American Heart Association meeting was a Swedish study showing that lack of good dental care could lead to severe illness. The study, which included data from 8,000 subjects, found that people with fewer than 21 remaining teeth showed a 69% higher risk of heart attack than subjects with most of their teeth intact.
The bacteria in plaque that causes swelling of the gums can get into the bloodstream and move to other parts of the body causing “trigger” reactions. Experts say it’s crucial that people carefully brush their teeth twice a day. In addition, they should have two professional cleanings per year -- and more if the patient already has swollen gums or individual risk factors such as being a smoker.
Read the full story in German by Jörg Zittlau
Photo – bark
*Newsbites are digest items, not direct translations
All rights reserved ©Worldcrunch - in partnership with Die Welt

China: Has The Convergence Of Scandal, Sex And Corruption Gone Too Far?

Op-Ed: Scandals and sex in China are becoming part of the scenery, but what if the public's eagerness to shame law-breaking officials is in itself undermining the rule of law?
Share on Facebook print
The image of the corrupt public official abounds in modern China The image of the corrupt public official abounds in modern China

*NEWSBITES
经济观察报E.O/Worldcrunch 
BEIJING - Prosecuted for taking bribes, making false accusations, and illegal business dealings. That was the already unhappy situation of Zhang Jingli, the former deputy commissioner of China’s State Food and Drug Administration.
And while he is still under investigation, what is his employer, the State Food and Drug Administration, doing? The government agency is openly broadcasting a video containing some “unsightly” scenes of Zhang’s visit to the Heaven on Earth, a high-end Beijing night club. Here, “unsightly” means pornographic. The State Food and Drug Administration defends its decision to release the video as an “internal processing decision.”
The airing of dirty laundry quickly sparked two very different reactions.
The gloaters are legion, charged up by yet another sex-ridden scandal involving a high ranking official. Zhang’s “embarrassment” suits them because they believe the exposure is beneficial for the public oversight of rotten public servants.
However, certain academics and others oppose the arbitrary violation of Zhang’s privacy, insisting that he should be sanctioned on legal, not moral grounds. Even if the court must ultimately be forced to judge him in part on evidence in the video, under no circumstances should Zhang’s right of privacy be violated in public -- and in particular before he is even sentenced.
As Yang Tao, a commentator with this newspaper points out: “The fact that Zhang Jingli is openly humiliated and made out to be a moral hazard and a wicked person… will not be conducive to his fair trial.” He also urges an investigation as to the origin of the video.
In 2007, Zheng Xiaoyu, the then commissioner of the State Food and Drug Administration, was found guilty of taking bribes and lowering pharmaceutical safety standards. His actions resulted in a number of deaths. He was executed rapidly as a political gesture, and “made an example of.”
Zhang Jingli had hoped to be Zheng’s replacement, but thwarted in this ambition, he became bitter and thereafter tried to unseat his new superior with unfounded accusations. It seems that the release of this damaging video may indeed be linked to this power struggle.
Read the original article in full in Chinese
*Newsbites are digest items, not direct translations
All rights reserved ©Worldcrunch - in partnership with eeo.com.cn

Extreme Fooding: A Visitor From Laos Compares His Nation's Exotic Eats To China's

Cobras and scorpions, centipedes and seahorses on bamboo sticks are among the things you never thought you'd taste. A Laotian in Beijing compares two of the world's more "out there" eating experiences.
Share on Facebook print
Wangfujing night market in the center of Beijing Wangfujing night market in the center of Beijing
By Souksakhone Vaenkeo
经济观察报E.O/Worldcrunch
BEIJING - Coming from a country where some people eat poisonous cobra, centipedes and toads, and having heard that the Chinese eat everything that flies except airplanes, everything with four legs except tables and everything that swims except submarines, I wanted to establish who eats stranger food, the Lao or the Chinese?
Wandering around Wangfujing night market in the center of Beijing, I was amazed by the odd creatures that people were eating. Street sellers were selling things that people would normally never want in their mouths. They were tempting tourists with barbecued scorpions and centipedes on sticks.
Although we Lao also eat poisonous insects, they’re not that common since it’s only the elderly who know how to prepare them. Even so, there are communities in Laos that add insects to their bottles of rice wine believing, despite the lack of evidence, that the alcohol is good for them.  
They also flavor their rice wine with herbs, wild animals’ bile, or a mix of poisonous animals like cobras, centipedes and scorpions.
Personally, I’ve never tried these strange foods, but my friend Phonsavanh Sangsomboun, who used to eat cobra salad, told me that such concoctions are popular with the elderly people in his central Laos hometown.
I'll have the cobra salad
The people believed that toxins from different poisonous animals will eliminate poison itself. “But I never drink that kind of alcohol since I am still young. It's a drink for old people, but I did used to eat cobra salad,” my friend said.
He said that cobra, wasn’t as tasty as the non-poisonous snakes. My uncle even says that he eats cobra salad to relieve pain in his muscles. It’s a skill to cook these strange foods; in order to cook cobra salad, for example, you need to remove the poison.
Bile-infused spirits and cobra salads aren’t exactly on sale in the shops. The alcohol is a more welcoming gift that Lao offer to visitors.  
For those unfamiliar with Indochinese cuisine, Wangfujing’s scorpions, centipedes and seahorses on bamboo sticks must seem extraordinary.
“We never eat seahorses. We only put dry ones inside our house because they’re believed to bring us good luck. Some jewelry shop owner put them inside their shops because they’re supposed to bring in customers,” said my shocked Filipino colleague Darwin Wally T. Wee.
And the starfish? “In our place, only kids play with them. We’d never eat them.”
Read the original article in The Economic Observer
All rights reserved ©Worldcrunch - in partnership with eeo.com.cn

Public sector strike to be 'largest for a generation'

Public sector workers around the UK are staging a strike over pensions in what unions say could be the biggest walkout for a generation.
Thousands of schools are closed and hospital operations have been cancelled. Courts and government offices are among disrupted services.
Prime Minister David Cameron described the strike as a "damp squib".
Unions object to government plans to make their members pay more and work longer to earn their pensions.
The strike is having the following effects:
  • Department for Education figures suggest more than half (58%) of England's 21,700 state schools are closed, with another 13% partly shut
  • In Scotland, 30 of the 2,700 council-run schools are believed to be open, says local authority body Cosla, while in Wales 80% of schools are shut. In Northern Ireland, three of the five education library boards have reported that over 50% of 1,200 schools are closed
  • Plane arrivals and take-offs at Britain's two biggest airports - Heathrow and Gatwick - are said to be largely unaffected with only a few cancellations of in-bound transatlantic flights to Heathrow
  • In Northern Ireland, no bus or train services are operating
  • Unions estimate about 300,000 public sector workers are on strike in Scotland while 170,000 workers in Wales are taking action
  • NHS managers say about 6,000 out of just over 30,000 routine operations have been cancelled across the UK as well as tens of thousands of appointments
  • BBC News Channel's chief political correspondent Norman Smith tweeted: "(Health Secretary) Andrew Lansley says patients who have ops cancelled today will still be seen within 18-week limit."
  • London Ambulance Service tells BBC London it is "struggling" and said people not in a life-threatening condition may not get an ambulance while South East Coast Ambulance Service says it is now only responding to "life-threatening emergencies"
  • Union leaders say although court staff are taking action, the trial of two men accused of killing of teenager Stephen Lawrence will not be disrupted
  • BBC political correspondent Mike Sergeant tweeted: "Union official outside HMRC in Whitehall predicting 70% of those who work in the building will strike."
  • Ahead of a national march which has started in London, four arrests were made, two for assaulting an officer and two for possession of a weapon
  • Sixteen job centres out of over 700 are closed, according to the cabinet office
  • Demonstrations are taking place across the UK, with thousands currently marching in places including Birmingham, Leeds, Exeter and Aberdeen
'Negotiating table'
Unions say up to two million public sector workers are to take part in the strike but the cabinet office said early indications show significantly less than a third of civil servants were taking strike action.

Why have strikes been called?

The government wants most public sector workers to:
  • Pay more into their pensions
  • Work for longer
  • Accept a pension based on a "career average" salary, rather than the current final salary arrangement which many are currently on
  • The government says the cost of funding public sector pensions is "unsustainable" as people are living longer
  • Unions say the proposals will leave members paying more and working longer for less
At Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Cameron said he thought the government had made a "very reasonable, very fair offer to public sector workers".
"I don't want to see any strikes, I don't want to see schools closed, I don't want to see problems at our borders, but this government has to make responsible decisions," he said.
Earlier, the prime minister's spokesman said a small number of Downing Street staff had gone on strike, while others had been affected by school closures and some staff from the Downing Street policy unit were helping out at the borders.
Speaking from Brussels, Chancellor George Osborne told BBC Breakfast that the "strike is not going to achieve anything" and will only "make our economy weaker and potentially cost jobs".
He said unions should be holding talks with the government to resolve the pension dispute, rather than taking strike action.

At the scene

Standing out in their suits, ties and smart overcoats, the headteachers took their place at the front of the march.
It's the first time their union, the NAHT, has been on strike for 112 years.
Chris Hill, head of Hounslow Town primary school, said all staff there were striking for the first time.
"It's not a decision we take lightly but we have to take a stand," she said.
Also among the thousands gathering in central London are paramedic staff, out for the first time since the 1970s.
Among the placards and balloons is a common message to the government, "Don't work longer, and pay more to get less."
Labour leader Ed Miliband said he had "huge sympathy" for people whose lives are disrupted by the strike.
But he said he was "not going to condemn the dinner ladies, nurses, teachers who have made the decision to go on strike because they feel they have been put in an impossible position by a government that has refused to negotiate properly".
Liberal Democrat Party president Tim Farron told the BBC News Channel the unions were wrong to strike because workers on low to middle incomes would get a "better, or certainly no worse" pension when they retire than is currently the case.
Union leaders have reacted angrily to Mr Osborne's Autumn Statement announcements of a public sector pay cap of 1% for two years, as well as bringing forward to 2026 the rise in the state pension age to 67.
Unison general secretary Dave Prentis told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme that industrial action by his union was rare but public sector workers "were annoyed". Millions of workers - mainly low-paid women - were being unfairly affected by changes to pensions, he said.
Public sector workers demonstrating in Newcastle Public sector workers have begun a march in Newcastle
Mr added that the last time unions met Treasury ministers was 2 November, adding "this idea that negotiations are continuing is just not true."
However Cabinet Minister Francis Maude disputed this claim, saying formal discussions with the civil service unions happened on Tuesday and that talks will take place with teaching unions on Thursday and with health unions on Friday.
TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said the public sector was "under attack" by the government, adding that the action was justified.
"With the scale of change the government are trying to force through, making people work much, much longer and get much, much less, that's the call people have made," he said.
'Unfair and unrealistic'
Paul Noon, leader of civil service union Prospect, said members felt the chancellor was "aiming yet another punch at them".
Education Secretary Michael Gove has said it is "unfair and unrealistic" to expect taxpayers to foot the growing public sector pensions bill.
Unison's Dave Prentis: ''This is about low paid women saving up six per cent of their salary for their pension''
Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union members who work for the UK Border Agency have gone on strike but airport sources suggested to the BBC that immigration controls are at two thirds of normal staffing levels - more than the 30-50% predicted previously.
The Immigration Services Union says 80% to 90% of staff are striking, with 22 out of 23 workers at Calais port not showing up for work and, as far as they are aware, none of their members are working at Heathrow.
Lucy Morton from the union said queues at Heathrow were "not that significant" due to reduced flight capacity, adding it will have more information when the next shift is due to turn up for work at lunchtime. The ISU has 4,500 members out of a workforce of 6,000.
The government has said no border controls will be relaxed to ease queues.
Gatwick's chief operating officer Scott Stanley said: "Whilst passengers have so far not experienced delays at the border zones we do expect delays to occur at some point today as the rate of arriving flights increases."
George Osborne: ''I would urge people - let's get back round the table''
A UK Border Agency spokesperson said: "Early signs show our contingency plans are minimising the impact of strike action, but waiting times at some ports may still be slightly longer than normal."
Simon Walker, of the Institute of Directors, told the BBC News Channel the strike was doing "significant damage" to the economy.
"If you're damaging the productive capacity of this country you're really doing huge damage to the fabric of the economy and that will last a long time and impact on all of us," he said.

Asia's students weigh up college options

WATCH: Ishan (left) wants to study architecture, but the competition for places is fierce
Families in Asia desperate to get a college education for their children are considering a variety of expensive options - including sending them to a local branch of a British or Australian university.
"Emotionally it's very taxing," sighed Seema Singh, talking about the All India Engineering Entrance Exam (AIEEE), which more than one million young Indians sit each year.
"It's the hardest time in my life," she says. "Sometimes, I have palpitations."
But Seema, 47, is not sitting the exam herself. She is worried for her son Ishan, 18.
She and her husband, who works in advertising in Delhi, are paying for extra coaching lessons for him, on top of his private school fees. He needs to do well in the test to stand a chance of reading architecture in a state-subsidised university.
New Middle Class logo
Across India, China and South East Asia, education is the key to being part of the story of economic growth. But competition for state-subsidised college places is now so tough that many families are considering the option of paying for an expensive degree abroad.
In India, technical subjects, especially engineering, are the most competitive. There are only 10,000 places at the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology (IITs), but last year almost half a million people tried to get in.
Ishan's parents are looking at the family budget and contemplating sending him abroad to college.
The option is now so popular, with many families raising expensive loans or spending their life savings, that a new profession has sprung up to help them: the education consultant.
Some education consultants work on commission from foreign colleges, and others charge fees. Victoria D'Sa is a partner at Global Education Consultancy Services, which has offices across India and charges around 25,000 rupees ($550/£341) for its services.
"India is the best country for undergraduate programmes," she advises, "because the cost is less."
Rising costs
Those who get into the very best Indian colleges on merit alone will be able to get a world-class education for around 70,000 rupees ($1,500/£932) per year, she estimates, which explains the crushing competition for these places. Some colleges reserve places for lower caste students as well.
Students taking entrance test in Bangalore Places in popular courses such as engineering are keenly contested
But even at inexpensive state colleges, costs have risen in recent years. Some colleges now offer "management quotas" which allow hopeful students or their families to pay a fee in return for a place. D'Sa estimates this payment could add 500,000 rupees ($11,100/£6,900) to the cost of an education.
But even the cheapest foreign option, Singapore, would cost around that much for each year of study alone - and that is before flights, rent and food are factored in. Western nations cost even more, with the US being the most expensive.
The high cost is one reason the Singhs hope Ishan will stay in India - at least for his undergraduate studies. "It's the masters that makes the difference," says his mother. "I would even think about having a loan for that."

Start Quote

Asian families consider education a long-term investment and are willing to dig deep into their pockets to ensure their children get quality education”
Jonathan Ong Engineering student
At undergraduate level "you're basically financing their partying abroad," says Ishan's father M P Singh (his son interrupts him, joking: "That's fine with me").
Masters degree fees are around 800,000 to 1,500,000 rupees ($17,000 to $33,000/£10,570 to £20,530) in the UK or Australia, estimates consultant D'Sa - and even more in the USA.
But European countries such as Germany are less expensive, and some nations, such as Finland or Norway, may even give financial assistance to Indian students.
For families elsewhere in Asia, there's a half-way option. Jonathan Ong has spent the last three years studying engineering at a British institution, the University of Nottingham, without ever leaving his home town of Kuala Lumpur.
Cheaper option
Nottingham opened its Malaysia campus in 1999, and its Chinese branch in 2006. Across the region, European, US and Australian campuses are springing up, often charging lower fees than they would if you studied at their original campus.
"Having foreign universities based in Malaysia gives the rest, who are not so financially-blessed to be able to go abroad, an opportunity to attain UK or US education at a cheaper cost," says Mr Ong.
Engineering student wearing safety glasses Asian families take the education of their children very seriously
Just like in India, state universities in Malaysia are competitive. They charge lower fees (often less than $1,000/£620 a year), but often have restrictive entry "quotas" - in this case, based on ethnicity rather than caste.
Quotas are one reason that Mr Ong, a blogger from Malaysia's Chinese minority, said he preferred to take a loan for 60% of his annual fees of 28,000 ringit ($9,300/£5,785) and study at the Nottingham campus.
He sees it as "quality education at a cheaper cost" and it has paid off - he has now started a career as a consultant.
Mr Ong says the costs may be high but that does not put people off.
"Asian families consider education a long-term investment and are willing to dig deep into their pockets to ensure their children get quality education," he says.
The opinions expressed are those of the contributors and not held by the BBC. The material is for general information only and does not constitute investment, tax, legal or any other form of advice. You should not rely on this information to make any investment decisions. Always obtain independent, professional advice for your own particular situation.

Thứ Ba, 29 tháng 11, 2011

Australia probe into iPhone 'fire' on plane

Australian air safety officials have launched an investigation after an airline passenger's Apple iPhone apparently caught fire during a flight.
Local airline Regional Express said the phone began glowing red and emitting dense smoke after the plane landed in Sydney on Friday.
Flight attendants had to douse the phone, which has since been handed to investigators.
Officials said they would be consulting Apple as part of their inquiry.
"We have no previous records of iPhones undergoing spontaneous self-ignition," a spokesman for the Australian Transport and Safety Bureau (ATSB) told AFP news agency.
"We do have the phone, it's in our custody, and we will be undertaking a technical examination of it."
Apple said it was looking forward to working with the investigators.

Thứ Hai, 28 tháng 11, 2011

Why Companies Aren't Getting the Employees They Need

Everybody's heard the complaints about recruiting lately.

Even with unemployment hovering around 9%, companies are grousing that they can't find skilled workers, and filling a job can take months of hunting.
Employers are quick to lay blame. Schools aren't giving kids the right kind of training. The government isn't letting in enough high-skill immigrants. The list goes on and on.
But I believe that the real culprits are the employers themselves.
With an abundance of workers to choose from, employers are demanding more of job candidates than ever before. They want prospective workers to be able to fill a role right away, without any training or ramp-up time.
Bad for Companies, Bad for Economy
[LECOVER] Andrea Levy
In other words, to get a job, you have to have that job already. It's a Catch-22 situation for workers—and it's hurting companies and the economy.
To get America's job engine revving again, companies need to stop pinning so much of the blame on our nation's education system. They need to drop the idea of finding perfect candidates and look for people who could do the job with a bit of training and practice.
There are plenty of ways to get workers up to speed without investing too much time and money, such as putting new employees on extended probationary periods and relying more on internal hires, who know the ropes better than outsiders would.
It's a fundamental change from business as usual. But the way we're doing things now just isn't working.
The Big Myths
The perceptions about a lack of skilled workers are pervasive. The staffing company ManpowerGroup, for instance, reports that 52% of U.S. employers surveyed say they have difficulty filling positions because of talent shortages.
But the problem is an illusion.
Some of the complaints about skill shortages boil down to the fact that employers can't get candidates to accept jobs at the wages offered. That's an affordability problem, not a skill shortage. A real shortage means not being able to find appropriate candidates at market-clearing wages. We wouldn't say there is a shortage of diamonds when they are incredibly expensive; we can buy all we want at the prevailing prices.
[COVERfactonline]
The real problem, then, is more appropriately an inflexibility problem. Finding candidates to fit jobs is not like finding pistons to fit engines, where the requirements are precise and can't be varied. Jobs can be organized in many different ways so that candidates who have very different credentials can do them successfully.
Only about 10% of the people in IT jobs during the Silicon Valley tech boom of the 1990s, for example, had IT-related degrees. While it might be great to have a Ph.D. graduate read your electrical meter, almost anyone with a little training could do the job pretty well.
A Training Shortage
And make no mistake: There are plenty of people out there who could step into jobs with just a bit of training—even recent graduates who don't have much job experience. Despite employers' complaints about the education system, college students are pursuing more vocationally oriented course work than ever before, with degrees in highly specialized fields like pharmaceutical marketing and retail logistics.
Unfortunately, American companies don't seem to do training anymore. Data are hard to come by, but we know that apprenticeship programs have largely disappeared, along with management-training programs. And the amount of training that the average new hire gets in the first year or so could be measured in hours and counted on the fingers of one hand. Much of that includes what vendors do when they bring in new equipment: "Here's how to work this copier."
The shortage of opportunities to learn on the job helps explain the phenomenon of people queueing up for unpaid internships, in some cases even paying to get access to a situation where they can work free to get access to valuable on-the-job experience.
Companies in other countries do things differently. In Europe, for instance, training is often mandated, and apprenticeships and other programs that help provide work experience are part of the infrastructure.
The result: European countries aren't having skill-shortage complaints at the same level as in the U.S., and the nations that have the most established apprenticeship programs—the Scandinavian nations, Germany and Switzerland—have low unemployment.
Employers here at home rightly point to a significant constraint that they face in training workers: They train them and make the investment, but then someone else offers them more money and hires them away.
The Way Forward
That is a real problem. What's the answer?
We aren't going to get European-style apprenticeships in the U.S. They require too much cooperation among employers and bigger investments in infrastructure than any government entity is willing to provide. We're also not going to go back to the lifetime-employment models that made years-long training programs possible.
[MISMATCHstats]
But I'm also convinced that some of the problem we're up against is simply a failure of imagination. Here are three ways in which employees can get the skills they need without the employer having to invest in a lot of upfront training.
Work with education providers: If job candidates don't have the skills you need, make them go to school before you hire them.
Community colleges in many states, especially North Carolina, have proved to be good partners with employers by tailoring very applied course work to the specific needs of the employer. Candidates qualify to be hired once they complete the courses—which they pay for themselves, at least in part. For instance, a manufacturer might require that prospective job candidates first pass a course on quality control or using certain machine tools.
Going back to school isn't just for new hires, either; it also works for internal candidates. In this setup, the employer pays the tuition costs through tuition reimbursement. But the employees make the bigger investment by spending their own time, almost always off work, learning the material.
Bring back aspects of apprenticeship: In this arrangement, apprentices are paid less while they are mastering their craft—so employers aren't paying for training and a big salary at the same time. Accounting firms, law firms and professional-services firms have long operated this way, and have made lots of money off their young associates.
Of course, a full apprenticeship model—with testing and credentials associated with different stages of experience—wouldn't work in all industries. But a simpler setup would: Companies could give their new workers a longer probationary period—with lower pay—until they get up to speed on the requirements of the job.
Promote from within: Employees have useful knowledge that no outsider could have and should make great candidates for filling jobs higher up. In recent years, however, an incredible two-thirds of all vacancies, even in large companies, have been filled by hiring from the outside, according to data from Taleo Corp., a talent-management company. That figure has dropped somewhat lately because of market conditions. But a generation ago, the number was close to 10%, as internal promotions and transfers were used to fill virtually all positions.
These days, many companies simply don't believe their own workers have the necessary skills to take on new roles. But, once again, many workers could step into those jobs with a bit of training.
And there's one on-the-job education strategy that doesn't cost companies a dime: Organize work so that employees are given projects that help them learn new skills. For example, a marketing manager may not know how to compute the return on marketing programs but might learn that skill while working on a team project with colleagues from the finance department.
Pursuing options like these vastly expands the supply of talent that employers can tap, making it both cheaper and easier to fill jobs. Of course, it's also much better for society. It helps build the supply of human capital in the economy, as well as opening the pathway for more people to get jobs.
It's an important instance where company self-interest and societal interest just happen to coincide.
Dr. Cappelli is the George W. Taylor professor of management at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and director of Wharton's Center for Human Resources. He can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

How to Get Your Dream Job in a Bad Economy

Employers are posting the most job openings in the past three years, reports the Labor Department, yet there are nearly 14 million people out of work competing for these jobs. This means there’s an average of 4.2 unemployed workers competing for each opening. Some of these jobs still haven’t been filled because job seekers don’t have the right skills to match certain positions. The Wall Street Journal reports that 52% of companies are having difficulty filling these positions. Despite the bad economy, you can get the job you want instead of settling for one that simply pays the bills. Here are five ways to make the most out of your job search:
1. Focus Your Job Search
Instead of submitting your resume to thousands of job openings on Monster.com, classified ads and corporate websites, narrow your search to the jobs you’re truly passionate about. In 2010, Simply Hired found that 83% of people choose jobs they love over more money, and they should. By putting all of your effort into finding jobs at companies you’re interested in, you will have a better chance at getting your dream job. Your positive attitude, work ethic, body language and persistence will shine through in your interviews and will give you the competitive edge in the hiring process.
2. Brush Up on Your Soft Skills
Just being good at your trade won’t cut it anymore. You have to have a whole set of soft skills, including leadership, teamwork and communication, as well as emotional intelligence. In fact, CareerBuilder reports that 71% of employers value emotional intelligence over IQ. You need to be able to deal with conflict in the workplace and get along with your co-workers. Employers want to hire employees that they can connect with both personally and professionally.
3. Tap into Your Network
Most job seekers don’t realize that the people around them can either hire them or refer them to a job. Don’t overlook your family, friends, professors, previous co-workers and the people that you meet at events and when you’re traveling. Also, make sure that you grow your online network using LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter. A recent survey by Jobvite.com states that 1 in 6 workers have used social networks to get hired.
4. Build Your Online Presence
Job searching is less about résumé submissions and more about being found online. Create your own custom blog using WordPress or use About.me for starters. Make sure you use your full name, a positioning statement that captures your expertise and a summary of your work experience. Create social profiles using the same positioning as your website and cross-link your properties. By writing blog posts and updating your social status routinely, recruiters will find you when they are looking to hire for a position. As long as your profiles are connected to what you’re passionate about, you will attract the right jobs and repel the wrong ones.
5. Create Your Own Marketing Campaign
You need to stand out if you want a job, and there are new strategies you can use to get an employer’s attention without having to submit a résumé. For instance, Matthew Epstein created a custom website that will appeal to Google, the company for which he wants to work. You can also create a video résumé that communicates who you are, what you do and what makes you different. There are nearing 17,000 video résumés on YouTube, but only a few really stick out. You can also create targeted advertising campaigns using Facebook Ads and Google AdWords in order to get your website right in front of specific employers.
Schawbel is the managing partner of Millennial Branding, LLC, a full-service personal-branding agency. He is the author of Me 2.0: 4 Steps to Building Your Future, the founder of the Personal Branding Blog, and publisher of Personal Branding Magazine

Read more: http://moneyland.time.com/2011/11/28/how-to-get-your-dream-job-in-a-bad-economy/#ixzz1f3xxGnbw

Woman Who Stole Sperm From Ex, Impregnated Herself With Twins

In a story that will certainly showcase some of the growing problems in the fertility industry, a Texas man claims his ex-girlfriend stole his sperm and used it to produce twins through in-vitro fertilization. The criminal case has garnered attention because of its new and unusual circumstances as well as it now getting attention in pro-life groups.
Joe Pressil, 36, claims his ex-girlfriend Anetria Burnett used his sperm from used condoms to artificially insemination herself without Pressil’s permission. The couple was in a relationship for only six months in 2007 when she became pregnant with twin boys. Pressil was not planning on having children with Anetria Burnett and was very surprised when she said she was pregnant because, “We always used condoms.” Later a DNA test would prove him to be the father and the court ordered him to pay $800 a month in child support.
But Burnett did not stop there, she got a court order to remain in Pressil’s Texas house and made a legal bid for half of his possessions including a common law marriage claim that was eventually rejected in court. In an interview with the New York Post he said, “A gold digger is an understatement. She was trying to get community property and alimony. She’s ruthless.” But then Pressil received some interesting news when he received a receipt from a fertility clinic addressed to him.
The plot got thicker when Pressil was asked by the company, Advanced Fertility Center of Texas, to sign a release form. From there he was able to put the pieces of the dubious plot together. He found out that Burnett was taking the condoms after sex and taking them to the clinic and saving them for a future in-vitro fertilisation procedure. When confronted with the plot Burnett said she did because she did not want to leave the house after they broke up. The fertility clinic assumed the couple was married when she had her successful procedure.
ex-girlfriend-steals-spermJason Gibson, Pressil’s attorney, says,“It’s not what you’re thinking when you’re in a relationship.”  Gibson goes on to say, “That’s not what most people are
thinking, that their partner is going to get a special condom, use that
condom as soon as you’re done having sex, run off to the fertility
clinic to go have an IVF procedure. That’s certainly not what my client
was thinking.”
Now, Pressil filed suit to avoid paying child support and is suing Burnett in Texas for custody of their sons.

Why are US teenagers driving less?

American Graffiti The kid with the coolest car ruled high school in mythical Fifties America
American teenagers are taking to the road in fewer numbers than ever before. What's behind this trend and does it mean the end of the car as adolescent status symbol and rite of passage?
If Ferris Bueller had a day off now, would he spend it on Facebook?
Recent research suggests many young Americans prefer to spend their money and time chatting to their friends online, as opposed to the more traditional pastime of cruising around in cars.
For the high school students in films like Ferris Bueller's Day Off and American Graffiti, cars were the ultimate expression of individuality and personal freedom - just as they have been for generations of Americans.
"It was a rite of passage and something to look forward to. You were only one of the cool kids if you drove and had your own vehicle," says Kristin Nevels, of the American Automobile Association.
Keith Martin, editor of Sportscar Market magazine, puts it more poetically: "Kids in the 50s and 60s wanted a set of wheels and they wanted a set of sexy wheels.
"It goes back to the the Wild West, when you got your first horse. You don't have to sit in your mom and dad's buggy any more. You have personal mobility."
'Act of rebellion'
But with money tight in many households, and the cost of gas and insurance soaring, some youngsters are having to choose between buying a car and owning the latest smartphone or tablet.

Start Quote

There is a great deal of pathos in America's love affair with the car and the open road as a symbol of freedom”
Dan Neil Wall Street Journal
In a survey to be published later this year by Gartner, 46% of 18 to 24-year-olds said they would choose internet access over owning their own car. The figure is 15% among the baby boom generation, the people that grew up in the 1950s and 60s - seen as the golden age of American motoring.
Wally Neil, a 25-year-old wholefood salesman, from Raleigh North Carolina, was determined to stand out from the crowd by not getting a driving licence and a car as soon as he was old enough.
But it was a decision made easier by the fact that he could speak to his friends online and play games with them over the internet so did not feel he was missing out.
"We were all pretty closely connected, even before Facebook.
"So we were not driving to our friends' houses, there was the gaming network and all that. We were putting the car on the back burner.
"There is a lot to be said for the video game killing the need for a car for a lot of kids."
For Wally, whose father Dan is a motoring writer and sports car enthusiast, walking everywhere or taking the bus when he was a teenager, rather than learning to drive, was "an act of rebellion".
Tougher tests
But he still had to put up with the taunts of his friends, he says, who could not wait to get behind the wheel and thought public transport was "for losers".
"I was ridiculed a little bit in my peer group but I was also saving a lot of money at the time."
Ferris Bueller's Day Off Would today's Ferris Bueller be updating his Facebook status instead of riding round town?
There is no question that fewer teenagers are on the roads in the US.
In 1978, 50% of 16-year-olds had obtained their first driving licence. In 2008, according to the US Transportation Department, it was just 30%.
The number of those aged 19 and under with driving licences has also been in steady decline since its 1978 peak, when 11,989,000 had one. In 2010, it was 9,932,441, or 4.1% of American drivers.
In the UK, 683,273 teenagers have driving licences - just 1.85% of total licence holders, according to Department of Transport figures from September 2010.
But the decline in the US may have more to do with tougher tests and the introduction of graduated licences in many states, which force drivers aged under 16 to be accompanied by licensed drivers of 21 years and older, than the growth of social networking.
Regional variations
In recent years, the annual number of journeys being made by American drivers of all ages has declined significantly for the first time ever.
Car use began falling in 2007, when average petrol prices almost doubled to $4.12 a gallon, and the economy started its slide into recession.
But there are signs it is back on an upward trajectory and America remains a country dominated by the automobile.
Graph showing car use in the US
It has a higher number of cars per head of population than any other country in the world, apart from the tiny principality of Monaco.
"Vehicles will always be a popular mode of transportation in America. You have to take into consideration some places don't have access to mass transit. Cars are the only way some people can get around," says Kristin Nevels.
This makes driving an imperative in some rural states, where roughly twice as many teenagers are on the road than in major metropolitan areas.
Teenage driver Driving means freedom, for many teenagers
Nevertheless, Wally Neil's father Dan, a motoring writer for the Wall Street Journal, is convinced that "American youth have fallen out of love with automobiles" because of the rising cost of motoring and the fact that they are "living their lives online".
He refuses to get misty-eyed about the "golden age" of teenage driving, however.
"The sadder of the two generations may be the earlier one, who spent their teenage years driving aimlessly around, with the car at the centre of all their mating rituals, struggling to make sense of where they were, clearly associating their status with the kind of car they drive.
"There is a great deal of pathos in America's love affair with the car and the open road as a symbol of freedom.
"The road isn't free. There is a fantastic downside of life based around the automobile."
'Safety regulations'
Keith Martin, who has teenage children, in addition to a collection of 10 high-powered classic sports cars, says American's post-War "sense of self-confidence" found perfect expression in its automobiles, which were "noisy, sexy and stylish".
Today's teenagers still love fast cars but as fantasy objects, he argues. Driving is much less fun than it used to be because of increased traffic congestion and the fact that the kind of cars most people can afford are "utilitarian" and difficult to customise.
"Modern cars are impossible to work on without screwing up the safety regulations," he says.
But he adds: "Teenagers are finding their own way in a different world to the one we grew up in. They have different means of connecting. In the 50s and 60s jumping in the car was all they had."
Wally Neil thinks the American teenager's romance with the automobile is far from over: "I think it will come back. I just don't see any longevity in Facebook or Twitter."
He finally obtained a driving licence two years ago and says he has never looked back.
"I have moved close to work now but I still use my car to get here. It is just so good to have it now. I know the value of it to a tee."

South Korea's wasted youth

Grandmother, Eun Ju-sung at the temple Praying for success: Eun Ju-sung is desperate to ensure her grandchildren receive university educations
There are not many excuses for turning up late to South Korea's national college entrance exam.
The most important day in a student's life, it determines which university - if any - each of them will go to and, by extension, what their future salary and status is likely to be.
And to ensure its students have the best possible chance, for one day every year Korea changes its aircraft flight schedules, holds up the morning rush-hour, and even discourages the military from moving outside its bases.
South Korea's education system is held up as a model around the world.
Generation Asia graphic
Some 80% of its high-school students now go on to further education.
But according to South Korea's president, that academic success is creating its own "social problem" - a youth unemployment rate of 6.7% in October, more than twice the national average, even as parts of the labour market are hungry for workers.
"Because there are so many people graduating from university at the moment, and looking only for high-end jobs, there's a mismatch between the job-hunters, and the positions available," explains Kim Hwan Sik, director of vocational training at the Education Ministry.
The problem began with mass lay-offs after the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s, he says.
When companies began hiring again, they found a glut of graduates willing to fill entry-level positions, putting pressure on all school-leavers to get a degree.
So these days, applicants' skills often fail to match employers' needs, according to Mr Kim. In addition, Korea loses years of much-needed earnings while they study.
Recipe for success?
Koo Woonmo, 17, is doing things differently. He has already decided he wants to become a chef.
Chef-class at Woonmo's vocational high school, Koo Woonmo second from right. Koo Woonmo hopes to cook up a solution to his career dilemmas
So rather than spend his school years cramming for the university entrance exam, he is learning practical skills at a specialist culinary high school.
Today's lesson: red bean noodles.
"My mum and dad didn't want me to go to this school, because in Korean culture men aren't supposed to cook in the kitchen," he says.
"People said 'Don't go', but I wanted to. I don't want to be a normal student. I don't want to work that hard."
It is quite normal for school children in South Korea to spend 14 hours a day studying for the college entrance exam - sometimes for years on end.
Parents often spend up to half the family's income on private tuition to help their off-spring beat the competition.
Equal worth?
These days, the government would rather have more students who think like Woonmo and opt for vocational training.
But even at Woonmo's vocational high school, half the students currently go on to higher education.
The head teacher here, Min-oo Sohn, says the school is coming under pressure from the government to reduce that number. But it is a policy he fears will create a two-tier system.
"I personally feel this is going to increase polarisation between those who go to university and those who go to vocational schools," he said.
Temple with parents praying special 'exam prayers' Korean parents often pray for their children's academic success
"And by trying to draw a line - when these students are just teenagers - over whether they want to go to university or not, it's making those decisions more rigid."
The government says it is well aware of the problems facing students who skip university.
"If someone straight out of high school is treated with less respect or financial return than a graduate, who on earth would want to take that route?" the education ministry's Kim Hwan Sik says.
"There needs to be a recognition that four years of experience on the job is equal to a degree.
"First the government needs to set a model example for employers, so that public institutions don't discriminate against high-school leavers. If the government takes the lead, changes will eventually trickle down to the private sector as well."
Two-tier system
To hammer the message home, the South Korean president, Lee Myung-bak, has been touring vocational schools recently, highlighting the career choices of what he calls Korea's new pioneers.
But he is up against some stiff opposition - not so much from students, perhaps, as from their older relatives.
In South Korea, parents will do almost anything to get their children into university.
At Seoul's main Buddhist temple, the price of an undergraduate in the family is two hours of prayer - every day - since July.
Hundreds of parents and grandparents have been turning up at these special examination-prayer sessions each afternoon to bow 108 times to the huge golden Buddhas staring down from the temple rafters.
Among them is Ju-sung Eun. Her granddaughter is sitting the college entrance exam this year, and Ms Ju-sung has been coming every day to pray for her success.
The government's plan to wean people away from university does not go down well with her.
"I don't agree with it," she says. "I think going to university is important for a person and I hope my granddaughter will achieve that."
It is a route that was not open for Ms Ju-sung in her day.
"I'm over 70," she cackles.
"In those days we didn't go to university. And because I didn't go, that makes my hope for my grandchildren even stronger."
Ms Ju-sung is old enough to remember the days before democracy, when a small group of elites ran this country.
The problems South Korea faces now are different - the results of its academic and financial success.
But for Ms Ju-sung - and many others here - fear of ending up on the wrong side of a two-tier system still runs deep.