Ever since the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing were 
identified as ethnic Chechens, the national conversation about the 
incident seemed to focus on the connection between the violence and 
Chechnya. The two brothers, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, certainly 
lived in two places at once: in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and in an 
imagined homeland in Chechnya and the North Caucasus more broadly. And 
although their ancestral land was something they knew mainly through 
family stories and nationalist mythology, they reveled in that part of 
their identity -- at least judging from their social media profiles and 
the other traces they left in the public domain. In other words, the 
Tsarnaevs seemed quintessentially American. Perhaps that is one reason 
their involvement in the Boston bombing is so horrifying.
Observers have already pointed out two elements of the brothers’ 
story that investigators will no doubt pursue: Tamerlan’s being visited 
by U.S. law enforcement officers in 2011 on a tip from an unnamed 
foreign government and his six-month visit to Russia, including to his 
father’s home in the North Caucasus republic of Dagestan, in 2012.
The North Caucasus region has seen no shortage of bombs and 
assassinations, and people from the area have been responsible for 
spectacularly brutal attacks on civilians in other parts of Russia, 
including the 2004 hostage crisis at an elementary school that left 380 
dead and the 2010 suicide bombings on the Moscow subway that killed 
forty.
So far, however, there is no direct information linking the North 
Caucasus to the attack in Boston; armed groups in the region, including 
the Dagestani branch of the so-called Caucasus Emirate -- the jihadist 
network in the North Caucasus headed by Chechen warlord Doku Umarov -- 
issued a formal statement denying any connection to the Tsarnaev 
brothers. The jihadists claimed instead that the brothers were pawns in 
an elaborate attempt by Russian security services to turn American 
opinion against the North Caucasus underground and against Muslims more 
generally. That might be far-fetched, but it would hardly be the line of
 argument the Emirate would pursue if it were suddenly using American 
operatives to expand attacks outside of Russia. The logical thing would 
have been for the Emirate to claim responsibility.
On his trip to Russia, Tamerlan may well have taken inspiration from 
the ongoing struggle between Russian security forces and Emirate 
fighters, but the modus operandi in that battle is decidedly different 
from the one attributed to the Tsarnaevs. In Dagestan, the targets tend 
to be uniformed police and security officials. In Chechnya -- a 
relatively peaceful place since the formal cessation of Russian military
 operations there in 2009 -- the targets are usually people that the 
jihadists label “apostates” -- local Chechens loyal to the regional 
government of President Ramzan Kadyrov, who has ruled Chechnya as a 
virtual puppet of Moscow since 2007. (His father, Akhmad Kadyrov, also 
Chechnya’s president, was assassinated by local jihadists in 2004.) The 
goal, in most cases, is to kill Russian government loyalists, whatever 
their ethnicity or religion.
Doku Umarov certainly did claim responsibility for some of the 
shocking terrorist attacks that have periodically ravaged Russia. But 
these date from before early 2012, when he formally called for an end to
 strikes on civilians. Other attacks have been the work of freelancers 
or local field commanders. In these cases, the brutality and scale are 
thought to have been efforts by these fighters to increase their own 
standing within the organization. The Tsarnaevs might have been 
freelancers themselves, but a relatively small-scale, although 
barbarous, attack in a foreign country would have been an odd resume 
builder for a person looking to catch the Emirate’s eye. And if Tamerlan
 received training in the North Caucasus during his most recent trip 
there, as some have posited, he put it to little use. The Boston bombing
 was considerably less sophisticated than the high-profile attacks 
formerly staged in Russia (or, for that matter, than the heavy-arsenal 
killing sprees of some American gunmen).
American and Russian officials will no doubt work together to follow 
up on any connections Tamerlan might have made during his most recent 
trip to the North Caucasus. According to the FBI, Russian security 
officials did, in fact, point him out to U.S. homeland security 
personnel in 2011, but if Moscow were truly serious about the potential 
threat, it would be inconceivable that Russian officials did not monitor
 him on his return to Dagestan the following year. And if Russia 
expressed no further interest in the case even after Tamerlan’s trip, it
 would not be surprising if the United States investigated and then 
dropped the case for wholly legitimate reasons.
Republican lawmakers have labeled this episode an intelligence 
failure by the Obama administration, but despite the stories of advance 
warnings from Moscow, Russian officials are now eager to cast attention 
away from the brothers’ ethnicity and any links with Russia itself. In a
 statement that came immediately after the Tsarnaevs were announced as 
suspects, Kadyrov pointed out that the brothers had no connections with 
Chechnya other than their family background. He argued that 
investigators should look to the American culture to explain their 
behavior. A senior official with Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 
Vladimir Kotliar, likewise downplayed any connections with Russia. Given
 that one of the Tsarnaev brothers was an American citizen, the other 
the holder of a Kyrgyz passport, and both residents of the United States
 for nearly a decade, Moscow’s bemusement at the intense American 
interest in finding a Russian angle is understandable.
It may yet emerge that Tamerlan did, in fact, have some link to the 
North Caucasus jihadist scene, but even if he did, it would still do 
little to explain the involvement of his younger brother, Dzhokhar, who 
seems to have been as deeply American as Lee Boyd Malvo, the younger 
shooter in the Washington sniper attacks of 2003. Nor would it likely 
have any real impact on U.S.-Russian relations, other than convincing 
some American policymakers of the point that their Russian counterparts 
take for granted: that people from the North Caucasus, by their very 
presence, are somehow a security threat. That will be especially 
important in the run-up to the Sochi Olympics in 2014, when Moscow will 
be especially security-obsessed and will want to deepen its already 
tough surveillance of religious Muslims, especially young men, in the 
North Caucasus. The United States, convinced of the threat, will likely 
look the other way when it comes to ongoing human rights abuses in the 
region.
The brothers’ father and aunt, Anzor and Maret, who have both spoken 
to the media, seem to have understood this point intuitively. They have 
consistently maintained that the two brothers were set up and are wholly
 innocent of any role in the Boston bombing. This may sound like a 
bizarre conspiracy theory but from the perspective of people from the 
North Caucasus, scenes of armored vehicles on city streets, an entire 
neighborhood in lock-down, and a dramatic shoot-out between heavily 
armed federal police and alleged terrorists on the lam are familiar 
sights. Sons that fall to Russian bullets are consistently believed to 
have been innocent victims. And in fact, many of them are. When Russian 
federal forces begin an “anti-terrorist operation,” few of the targets 
exit alive. The Watertown, Massachusetts, operation was a different 
matter entirely, of course, but the optics were all too familiar. With 
the Tsarnaev family’s background, distrusting the state -- any state -- 
comes with the territory, and in the North Caucasus, that is never a bad
 rule of thumb to follow.
In the long term, the Chechnya link will probably end up being less 
important than, oddly, the Syrian one. In blocking further international
 involvement in the Syrian crisis, Russian officials have long 
maintained that Syrian rebel groups are dominated by al Qaeda 
affiliates, whose victory in the Syrian civil war will have dire 
consequences for the region and beyond. Now, Russians have already begun
 to portray the Tsarnaevs as an unlikely link between Boston and 
Damascus. There are somewhere “between 600 and 6,000” Chechens from the 
North Caucasus fighting in Syria, said Kotliar in a recent interview 
with Russian media, “and from what happened in Boston, perhaps Americans
 will finally draw the lesson that there are no good terrorists and bad 
terrorists, no ‘ours’ and ‘yours.’” Keep arming the Syrian rebels, the 
argument goes, and sooner or later you will have to face the 
consequences of a Syria overtaken by Islamist radicals.
That might not be a bad line of reasoning, especially given what we 
know about the complicated mix of ideologies and motivations inside the 
Syrian opposition movement. And after Boston, Moscow now has an 
additional argument, however tenuous, against greater international 
involvement in Syria. That is also why, from the perspective of the 
Tsarnaevs’ parents, things all look like a set-up -- tarnishing the 
reputation of Chechens as a way of serving some vague end contemplated 
by an all-powerful Russian state. Chechnya’s moment in the American 
consciousness may end up leading in a bizarre direction: the tragic 
aftereffects of the death and maiming of people in Massachusetts may 
well be the continued killing and brutalization of a great many more in 
Syria.
 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét