Chủ Nhật, 31 tháng 7, 2011

The City of Angels Who Never Sleep: Can Downtown Los Angeles Be Manhattanized?

Los Angeles and New York City are about as different as two cities can get. New York is vertical while is L.A. horizontal. NYC is about the subway; L.A., the car. New York has its nightlife concentrated in Manhattan, while downtown L.A. has traditionally been the laughing stock of the city's nightlife. Now that is changing. Downtown, which used to be dead after working hours, is working hard to become a hub for entertainment, sports, dining and housing, in addition to continuing as a day-time financial center. Some are even calling it the "Manhattanization" of downtown.
On a recent Saturday night, there were scenes typical of a happening city center. Hummer limos cruised the streets. Partiers sauntered down the area's sidewalks and joined lines of people waiting outside nightclubs for admission. Some apparently inebriated club-goers climbed atop a large yellow Denny's restaurant sign and waved their arms as a friend snapped an off-balance picture. People exited the Regal cinemas after showings had finished. The nearby Nokia Theatre prepared to host ESPN's Espy awards show and an American Idol performance that week. Club Nokia, its smaller neighbor, was due to host Boyz II Men and Jamie Foxx in a few days. Looking down on it all was the new 54-story Ritz Carlton tower, which is attached to a J.W. Marriott. (Read about prep for a two-day closure of the 405 freeway)
Downtown development took a hit in the recession, but is now coming back. Over the past decade, $15 billion in private investment has helped create $40 million in net new tax revenue and 90,000 new jobs, says Jan Perry, city Councilwoman for the district. It's the result of a concerted effort by city officials to use tax revenues to make downtown "an area that can be considered alive 24-7 and be a major center for arts, entertainment and culture," Perry says. Residential developers are also looking to downtown because the far-reaching suburbs of L.A. county have pushed out almost as far as they can go. "Who wants to sit in a car for three hours everyday getting to their place of employment from the Inland Empire?" says Dan Fasulo, managing director at Real Capital Analytics, a research firm specializing in the commercial real estate market. "Employers are finding that to attract the best people they need to locate in places where there's access to multiple forms of transportation. One of those places is city centers."
Nothing reflects the disparity between the new and old downtown like the stimulating L.A. Live district and its aging neighbor, the convention center. The former is a new entertainment nucleus spanning four million square feet, or six city blocks, which houses bars, restaurants, movie theaters, hotels, live music venues, and Staples Center, the 20,000-seat arena that houses four professional sports teams including the Lakers. Before Staples, "nobody came downtown," says Michael Roth, spokeman for Anschutz Entertainment Group, which owns the arena and L.A. Live. "It created a destination downtown." The adjacent convention center, however, is a vestige of the past. It's 40 years old years old and looks it. Its West Hall needs about $50 million in investment to bring it up to date. "Forget about functionality; aesthetics-wise it's just very odd. It stands out," says Pouria Abbassi, general manager and CEO of the convention center. Its 1971 design is antique "juxtaposed to L.A. Live and Staples Center." (Video: Tackling traffic in L.A.)
Enter AEG, which owns sports franchises and other large venues including Miami's American Airlines Arena. It is proposing to build a $1 billion football stadium next to Staples called Farmers Field that would bring a National Football League team back to Los Angeles for the first time since the Rams and Raiders skipped town in the 1990s. The plan calls for AEG to build the 68,000-seat stadium where West Hall stands today, and for the city to sell bonds to afford a new convention center wing. The field itself could also be used for large conventions. This week, the company and the city signed a memorandum of understanding to build the stadium, which AEG hopes can open by the 2016 season. AEG says the field would bring even more development and jobs to downtown, and allow the city to host mega-events like the Super Bowl and Final Four. "The greatest economic benefit for the city is through the convention, tourism and hospitality markets," Roth says. The field "will give it the biggest shot in the arm."
It's not just heavyweight AEG investing downtown. Philanthropist Eli Broad is building a $130 million art museum that is scheduled to open in 2013. The historic Belasco Theater, which lay dormant for 20 years, just reopened after being restored. Developers new to downtown are investing in housing, such as the Affirmed Housing Group, which chose the area for its first project in the L.A. market. Officials are even studying a project to build a street car system. Portland-based developer Williams & Dame bought a parking lot across from the Ritz Cartlon to build a tower that will house a Courtyard by Marriott and Residence Inn. "The dynamics for downtown Los Angeles are terrific for the future," says Homer Williams of Williams & Dame. "You're getting that 24-hour feel that cities need."
Even with the changes, L.A. is unlikely to become another New York. It still loves its cars, and it still has its multiple urban centers stretched out across Southern California, which are unlikely to have their thunder stolen by downtown. And some of them, such as Hollywood, have gotten their own big boost of investment in recent years. "We're Los Angeles," Councilwoman Perry says. "There are a lot of unique aspects to what we're doing that are reflective of Los Angeles desires and tastes and interests."

The End of America's Most Wanted: Good News for Criminals, Bad News for the FBI

The fugitives of the U.S. may be heaving a sigh of relief at the news that the television show America's Most Wanted is no more. After 23 years of profiling the dregs of the criminal underworld — directly leading to 1,154 arrests by law-enforcement agencies — the show was canceled in May by Fox, and its final episode aired last month. The close working relationships that host John Walsh cultivated with the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service over the years was an unprecedented collaboration between law enforcement and television. It was one of the very first reality shows that resulted in great TV and did a lot of good. Its cancellation leaves a hole both of those agencies will now need to fill.
"This is a big hit for us. The show is invaluable," says Geoff Shank, assistant director of investigative operations for the U.S. Marshals Service. "We have arrested so many heinous people and we've saved so many lives because of America's Most Wanted." Kevin Perkins, assistant director of the FBI's criminal-investigations division, echoes the sentiment. "I personally hate to see it go," Perkins tells TIME. "We had 17 of our most wanted fugitives captured because of them and over 550 different cases solved as a result of tips." (See the top 10 America's Most Wanted captures.)
Launched in 1988, America's Most Wanted debuted spectacularly. Walsh had been plucked by executives of the upstart Fox Broadcasting Company while working as an advocate for missing children and crime victims after his son Adam had been abducted and murdered in southern Florida in July 1981 — 30 years ago this week. In the very first America's Most Wanted episode, Walsh laid out the case of David James Roberts, a prison escapee on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list who had been convicted of 17 rapes and of murdering a family and an infant. The story made for riveting television, and before the broadcast was even over, tips started pouring into the America's Most Wanted call center. Within four days, Roberts was captured. "Whoever was sitting in my desk at that time had to say, 'Man, we've got something good here,' " Perkins says of the show.
The combination of Walsh's passion, a favorable time slot (Saturday at 9 p.m.) and a production style with re-enactments that humanized the crimes without being overly graphic or salacious made for consistently high ratings; the show averaged 5 million to 6 million viewers each week. It also ushered in an era of efficiency in crime solving that was without precedent. As the show's popularity swelled, Walsh used it as a platform to help get legislation passed, including 1998's Amber Alert bulletins and the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (named for Walsh's son), which created a national sex-offender registry in 2006. "We can send a thousand FBI agents out to knock on a thousand doors and talk to a thousand people, and we can send a couple of FBI agents to do America's Most Wanted on a weekend and touch millions of people," Perkins says. "The results bear that out. We've had captures come in a matter of minutes after a show was aired."
So why would Fox end a program that was helping catch criminals and solve high-profile cases like the Elizabeth Smart kidnapping? It may come down to dollars and cents. While the show remained popular with viewers through this past season, it wasn't a moneymaker — production costs were high, and each episode contained time-sensitive information, which means there's no opportunity for reruns. "Unfortunately, our show can't be repeated," Walsh says. "We're not Glee."
America's Most Wanted was produced in Washington, D.C., and each Saturday, agents from the FBI and the U.S. Marshals attended the airing of the show. "It was a reciprocal relationship," Shank says. "We provided them cases week in and week out." The toughest cold cases, fugitive cases and breaking missing-child cases were America's Most Wanted's specialty. "I've done white collar crimes over the years, but we always get the feedback to stick to the murderers, serial killers, child molesters and rapists. Catch those bastards first," Walsh tells TIME. (Read about Fox's issue with America's Most Wanted.)
Walsh's personal commitment to fighting crimes against women and children led him to help found the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in 1984, and he specifically advocated for it through his show. He also worked hard to build trust with viewers, whose tips made America's Most Wanted a success. "[Tipsters] know I guarantee anonymity," Walsh says. "We don't trace or tap calls. That would break the bond of trust I have with the viewers."
That bond was notably on display last winter when America's Most Wanted aired a segment on the murder of Hollywood publicist Ronni Chasen. A tipster called in; he was tentative and afraid. "We talked to him and nurtured him," Walsh says. This caller believed his neighbor Harold Smith had killed Chasen. Police investigated the tip, put Smith under surveillance and were apprehending him when he shot himself. According to police, Smith was in fact Chasen's killer. "[That caller] was the single most important tip," Walsh says. "He was the tip."
Other high-profile cases that were solved in conjunction with America's Most Wanted include Los Angeles' "Grim Sleeper" serial-killer case; the capture of Ira Einhorn, an activist who claimed to be a founder of Earth Day and who brutally murdered his girlfriend; and the Elizabeth Smart abduction case, which Walsh covered 10 times and counts as the highlight of his entire 23-year run on the show. "I couldn't get Adam back alive, but we got [Elizabeth] back after eight months," he says.
America's Most Wanted has spawned multiple local productions — among them Oklahoma's Most Wanted, Amarillo Crime Stoppers and Chicago's Most Wanted — and Walsh has increasingly ventured into other countries to track down American fugitives, catching more than 30 profile subjects in foreign lands. The most recent success came three days after the final show, broadcast from Rio de Janeiro and focusing on Kenneth Craig, a fugitive on the G-8 Most Wanted Sex Offenders list. Within three days of the show's airing, Craig, who had been teaching English to children in a Brazilian slum, turned himself in.
In the absence of Walsh and his team, the FBI and U.S. Marshals say they'll look for other ways to spread the word about their work. "We've got a robust public-affairs office, and we're constantly looking to exploit other media outlets," Shank says. And Walsh's quest to get justice for victims and their families won't go down with the show. Fox has asked him to host four two-hour specials next season, and beyond that, he is determined to find a home for an international incarnation of America's Most Wanted — he's calling it World's Most Wanted — which is a project he was working on prior to his show's cancellation. "We live in a global society, and I believe we should make the world a smaller place for these bad guys," Walsh says, adding, "I have a different motivation than most people on TV. A very, very different motivation."

China Jails Journalist Who Reported on Corruption

BEIJING — A Chinese court has upheld the eight-year sentence of an investigative journalist in Shandong Province who had already completed a four-year term on charges of “extortion and blackmail” — charges that his lawyers say were concocted to silence him. 
The journalist, Qi Chonghuai, 46, was two weeks away from release last month when the same court that convicted him in 2008 retried him on the same charges. Human rights advocates have described the entire legal process as flawed and say the second conviction is a blatant violation of Chinese law.
Mr. Qi was originally detained after he wrote a series of articles in the state-run media detailing corruption among local party officials in the city of Tengzhou. The articles included an expose into the construction of a lavish government building and the beating of a female employee who was late for work.
Less than two weeks after the articles were published, Mr. Qi was detained by the police and, according to relatives, subjected to 11 months of physical and psychological abuse by members of the Tengzhou Public Security Bureau. They said his time in prison was marked by repeated torture, beatings by other inmates and hard labor in a prison coal mine.
According to the organization Human Rights in China, the authorities decided to prolong Mr. Qi’s detention after he told the Tengzhou mayor and other top officials he planned to continue his anticorruption work after his release.
On Friday another rights group, Chinese Urgent Action Working Group, filed an urgent appeal on Mr. Qi’s behalf with the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights

Thứ Sáu, 29 tháng 7, 2011

'Super antibody' fights off flu

Swine flu virus A jab protecting against all flu viruses is considered a holy grails of vaccine research

Related Stories

The first antibody which can fight all types of the influenza A virus has been discovered, researchers claim.
Experiments on flu-infected mice, published in Science Express, showed the antibody could be used as an "emergency treatment".
It is hoped the development will lead to a "universal vaccine" - currently a new jab has to be made for each winter as the virus changes.
Virologists described the finding as a "good step forward".
Many research groups around the world are trying to develop a universal vaccine. They need to attack something common to all influenza which does not change or mutate.
Human source
It has already been suggested that some people who had swine flu may develop 'super immunity' to other infections.
Scientists from the Medical Research Council's National Institute for Medical Research at Mill Hill and colleagues in Switzerland looked at more than 100,000 samples of immune cells from patients who had flu or a flu vaccine.
They isolated an antibody - called FI6 - which targeted a protein found on the surface of all influenza A viruses called haemagglutinin.
Sir John Skehel, MRC scientist at Mill Hill, said: "We've tried every subtype of influenza A and it interacts with them all.
"We eventually hope it can be used as a therapy by injecting the antibody to stop the infection."
Professor Antonio Lanzavecchia, director of the Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Switzerland, said: "As the first and only antibody which targets all known subtypes of the influenza A virus, FI6 represents an important new treatment option."
When mice were given FI6, the antibody was "fully protective" against a later lethal doses of H1N1 virus.
Mice injected with the antibody up to two days after being given a lethal dose of the virus recovered and survived.
This is only the antibody, however, not the vaccine.
A vaccine would need to trigger the human body's immune system to produce the antibody itself.
Sir John said the structure of the antibody and how it interacted with haemagglutinin had been worked out, which would help in the search for a vaccine, but that was "definitely years away".
Professor John Oxford, a virologist at Queen Mary, University of London, said: "It's pretty good if you've got one against the whole shebang, that's a good step forward."

Norway mass killer Breivik faces fresh interrogation

Police say they will question Anders Behring Breivik again on Friday, to follow up new leads on the Norwegian massacre and bombing.
It will be the second interrogation for the extremist, who admits carrying out the attacks that killed 76 people.
Mr Breivik has been in solitary confinement since his court appearance on Monday.
One week after the killings, Norway's leaders will join bereaved relatives for a memorial service in Oslo.
The service has been organised by the youth movement of the Norwegian Labour party, which was the target of the shootings on Utoeya island.
The prime minister and most of his government will attend the event. The principal message will be that Norway's democracy will not be undermined by extremism.
Synne Roeyneland (18) from Oslo, who has been confirmed as one of those killed on 22 July 18-year-old Synne Roeyneland from Oslo is one of those newly confirmed as a victim of the 22 July massacre
As to the self-confessed gunman; in addition to answering police questions, he will also be assessed by psychiatrists.
His lawyer has claimed publicly that his client is insane.
The police called off their search of Utoeya island on Thursday afternoon, but continue to drag the surrounding lake for remains.
They also released the names of another 24 people killed. The process is taking days, because the authorities are scrupulously following a procedure of contacting relatives when they have positively identified victims.
Most were teenagers. The youngest of those named so far was Johannes Buoe, aged 14.
Two foreigners are now known to have died; one Georgian and one Danish citizen.
But the BBC's Jon Brain in Oslo says the police have admitted for the first time that they are not sure how many people are still missing.
Closed hearing
Mr Breivik has claimed he acted to stem what he called the Islamisation of western Europe, blaming the government for allowing it to happen.
His next interrogation will focus on whether there is "any more danger", according to police attorney Paal-Fredrik Hjort Kraby.
The BBC's Jon Brain says authorities have plans to archive tributes to the victims of the Oslo attacks
Detectives want to question Mr Breivik on "information received over the last few days - which is a lot," added Mr Kraby, though he did not elaborate.
After the custody hearing on Monday, which was closed to the public, the presiding judge said Mr Breivik claimed there were two other cells working with him.
His next court hearing will be closed as well, "just in case he's able to send messages by code" to associates, said Mr Kraby.
Despite the fears, Norwegian authorities have said they believe Mr Breivik acted alone.
Norwegian domestic intelligence chief Janne Kristiansen said no evidence had so far been found linking Anders Behring Breivik with far-right extremists in Norway or elsewhere.
Norway's chief prosecutor has said he expects the indictment will not be ready before the end of the year.
Tor Aksel Busch said he hoped the trial could be held next year

Questions shroud Libya rebel Abdel Fattah Younes' death

Gen Abdel Fattah Younes was an ally of Col Gaddafi for many years
Mystery surrounds the circumstances of the killing of Libya's rebel military commander, Gen Abdel Fattah Younes, a day after he and two aides were shot.
Rebel leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil said they had been killed by gunmen after Gen Younes was recalled from the front for questioning by judges.
However he gave no details about the identity or motives of the assailants. The bodies have not been recovered.
Reports said Gen Younes was suspected of ties to pro-Gaddafi forces.
The general - a former interior minister who had served at the heart of Col Muammar Gaddafi's regime since the 1969 coup - joined the rebels at the beginning of the Libyan uprising in February.

Analysis

There are a lot of questions about exactly what happened on Thursday and what the sequence of events was. We're told that Gen Younes had been due to appear before a panel of rebel judges to answer a number of questions on a military matter. We're not entirely sure what that was.
In a conflict like this where there are not many facts and one side of the country is fighting another, we tend to get an awful lot of rumours and suggestions.
For what it's worth, some of the ones we're hearing is that there was a worry among the rebels that the military campaign was not going very well. They wanted to question the general.
Some of the speculation we're hearing in Tripoli, coming from Col Gaddafi's side, is that the general was simply not trusted by the rebels.
The BBC's Ian Pannell in the rebel-held city of Misrata says his defection was seen as a coup, but there had been rumours that he had kept contacts with the Gaddafi leadership.
Mr Jalil announced the general's death late on Thursday, and said the head of the group of men who killed him had been captured.
Mr Jalil, who heads the rebel National Transitional Council, did not say who the assailants were or where the attack took place.
Although the bodies of Gen Younes and his aides have not been found, Mr Jalil said there would be three days of mourning in their honour.
Gen Younes was due to appear before a panel of judges in the rebel capital, Benghazi.
The exact nature of the questions he was facing is also unclear. Mr Jalil said they regarded military operations.
Some unconfirmed reports said Gen Younes and two aides had been arrested earlier on Thursday near Libya's eastern front.
Shortly after the announcement of their death, gunmen entered the grounds of the hotel in the eastern city of Benghazi where Mr Jalil was speaking, reportedly firing into the air before being convinced to leave.
Ddivisions in Benghazi

Abdel Fattah Younes

Younes
  • Helped Libyan leader Col Muammar Gaddafi take power in the 1969 coup that ousted King Idris
  • Close advisor to the Libyan leader for four decades, rising to the post of general and training Col Gaddafi's special forces
  • Appointed interior minister
  • Quit the government on 22 February 2011 and defected to the rebels - one of the earliest such moves by a senior official
  • Appointed as the opposition's military chief in April, but faced mistrust due to his past ties to Col Gaddafi
Earlier on Thursday, rebels said they had seized the strategically important town of Ghazaya near the Tunisian border, after heavy fighting with Col Gaddafi's forces.
They reportedly took control of several other towns or villages in the area.
The rebels are struggling to break a military deadlock five months into the uprising against Col Gaddafi's rule.
Rebels control most of eastern Libya from their base in Benghazi and the western port city of Misrata, while Col Gaddafi retains much of the west, including the capital, Tripoli.
Late on Thursday AFP news agency reported explosions shaking the centre of Tripoli, as state TV reported that planes were flying over the Libyan capital.
Nato, acting under a UN mandate authorising military action for the protection of civilians, has carried out regular air strikes in the Tripoli area.
Our correspondent says his death will feed international suspicions that the rebel cannot be trusted.
South Africa's ambassador to the UN on Thursday warned that supporters of the rebels were in danger of violating UN sanctions and criticised calls by Western governments for Col Gaddafi to stand down.
The BBC's Barbara Plett at the UN says the growing trend to grant diplomatic recognition to the Libyan rebels is facing opposition on the Security Council.
About 30 countries have recognised the NTC.

Poland finds Russia at fault for presidential jet crash

A Polish report has found that Russia was partly to blame for the air crash last year which killed then-President Lech Kazynski.
It said that pilot error was the main reason for the crash, but that air controllers and poor lighting at Smolensk were also at fault.
The crash killed 96 people and has been a source of tension between the two countries.
Russia previously blamed the Polish crew for the April 2010 accident.
The report by Warsaw said airport lighting was "defective and incomplete", while a landing zone official had given "erroneous information" to the crew as they prepared to land at the Russian city of Smolensk.
All those on board, who included officials spanning the country's military and political elite, were killed when their airliner crashed while trying to land in heavy fog.
They had been on their way to a memorial for the victims of Katyn, where 20,000 Polish officers were massacred by Soviet forces in 1940

Thứ Năm, 28 tháng 7, 2011

A Volcano on the Moon — Where None Should Be

Human beings have been staring at the moon since long before we were human beings at all. Far back in biological history, some light-sensitive eyespot on some prehuman thing must have first registered the shimmer of moonlight, and the lunar love affair began.
For most of the eons that have passed since then, we only looked at part of the moon — the half that is eternally pointed toward Earth. It wasn't until 1968, during the flight of Apollo 8, that the first modern human eyes got an in-person look at the mysterious far side. (See TIME's special report on the 40th anniversary of the moon landing.)
The differences between the two hemispheres could not be clearer. While the facing side of the moon features vast, dark plains of cooled lava — which the ancients assumed were seas — the far side is mostly an expanse of tens of thousands of impact craters. It is the tug of the Earth, astronomers believe, that is responsible for the different topography. Earthly gravity pulls with greater force on the dense, iron-and-magnesium interior of the moon than on the lighter upper layers. This causes the core to shift slightly earthward, thinning out the crust on that half of the moon. Volcanoes or meteor impacts on the near side could thus cause more copious lava bleeds, which spread out across the surface and form plains. The far side had a tougher hide and was thus less easily damaged.
That, in any case, is part of the story. But when the Lunar Prospector spacecraft orbited the moon in 1998, it found something curious: a bright bull's-eye of radioactive thorium on the far side of the moon between the craters Compton and Belkovich — a formation that seemed suspiciously volcanic. Now the next-generation Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has turned its optical cameras on the site and has indeed discovered a vented mountain in the center of the thorium field, suggesting that not only is volcanism responsible but a particularly rare type of volcanism — at least on the moon — that produces lighter silicas instead of heavier basalts. What's more, while all lunar volcanoes were assumed to have last stirred 3 billion to 4 billion years ago, this one appears much fresher — just a billion or so years old. (See pictures of the Space Shuttle Endeavour's launch.)
"To find evidence of this unusual composition located where it is and appearing to be relatively recent ... is a fundamentally new result and will make us think again about the moon's volcanic and thermal evolution," says planetary scientist Bradley Jolliff of Washington University, who led the LRO research team.
From its earliest history, the moon was never going to be as geologically active a place as Earth. It was just too small and thus cooled fast, shutting down its thermal engines when it was still relatively young. Without that internal heat and the fluidity that results, the moon could not develop Earth's complex system of plate tectonics that keeps rocks recycling and allows shallow deposits of lava to crystallize into lighter silicates. (See "The Universe, to Scale: New Images of Outer Space.")
All this should have ruled out the phenomenon the Lunar Prospector team spotted and the LRO team confirmed. But what the LRO's cameras recorded was unmistakable: a volcanic field up to 35 km (22 miles) across, with a peak at the center defined by a distinctive volcanic vent. The presence of thorium, which is often found mixed with silicates, was the telltale marker of a particularly shallow volcano. And the freshness of the field — comparatively free of meteor craters — put its formation at just a billion years ago.
"We see small-scale features that haven't been completely beaten up and obliterated by the impact process," says Jolliff.
Jolliff and his colleagues can't say with certainty how the volcano formed, but they are reasonably certain it can't be due to heat generated by radioactive deposits in the moon's core, since they would have long ago decayed. Instead, the outer core of the moon might not be cold and solidified, as geologists assumed, but rather may still be molten. "A pulse of heat from deep in the mantle might melt a pocket of ... rock at the base of the crust," Jolliff says. "As this lava began to crystallize, it would have differentiated to produce a more silicic melt that was enriched in thorium." (See images from space by an astronaut photographer.)
O.K., it might take a geologist to get even remotely excited by a phrase like "a more silicic melt that was enriched in thorium," and at some point most people lose the thread of why such arcane rock science matters. But this rock science might challenge some of our most basic assumptions about how Earth's closest cosmic companion formed — and how active it remains today. Greater insight could come later this year when NASA launches the GRAIL mission (an acronym for gravity recovery and interior laboratory), in which a pair of satellites will orbit the moon in tandem and study lunar gravity by measuring tiny fluctuations in the distance between the two craft. This, in turn, will yield more data about the moon's internal anatomy.
For now, robots will be the only way to study these questions, since NASA's most recent manned moon program has been scrapped. "What we really need to test this and other new ideas about the moon," says Jolliff, "is sustained human exploration of our nearest and geologically very interesting neighbor." That's not going to happen anytime soon, but for now, the machines are doing an impressive job in our stead.

Technologizer It Just Doesn't Work: Why New Tech Products Are Increasingly Unsatisfying

When Steve Jobs is delighted with a new Apple product — which, as you may be aware, he usually is — he flatters it with three simple words: "It just works." Anyone who tried Apple's Mobile Me service in the months immediately following its release knows that reality doesn't always live up to Jobs' promise of magical simplicity. But at least the company tries to make things just work. Lately, though, I've been wondering whether some of its competitors are doing the same.
I've been reviewing technology products for 20 years now. I've seen it all, from products that were amazing from the get-go (the first PalmPilot comes to mind) to ones that were downright hazardous (a mouse that caught on fire). But there's never been a time when so much of the new stuff I look at is so very far from being ready for mass consumption. Sometimes it's a tad quirky; sometimes I can't get it to work at all. And when I call the manufacturers for help, they're often well aware of the problems I encountered. (See the all-TIME top 100 gadgets.)
What's going on here? There are three main culprits:
The beta culture. Once upon a time, products that were labeled as beta were indeed undergoing beta testing. They were works in progress, and nobody dreamed of sharing them with the general public. The Internet changed that by making it easy to distribute prereleases to millions of people. And then Google rendered the beta moniker largely meaningless by applying it indefinitely to massively popular services like Gmail. (The company has since largely backed away from beta gimmickry; among other reasons, it discovered that big corporate customers aren't so excited by products that claim to be unfinished.)
A world in which anything can be a beta is a world in which no product must be complete. That might be O.K. if you're talking about free software, but the philosophy is rubbing off on hardware that people pay hundreds of dollars for. Even if companies don't call hardware beta, they clearly think of it that way. (See the best netbooks and netbook accessories.)
One notable example was Motorola's Xoom tablet, which arrived back in February with rain checks for three of its notable features: 4G support, Flash and support for its MicroSD slot. Today, some owners have the update that enables MicroSD, others don't, and everyone's still waiting for the overdue 4G upgrade. Sounds like a beta product to me.
Oddly enough, the products that Google labels as betas are usually more refined than ones that some companies claim are complete. But when I tried the Samsung Series 5, a "Chromebook" that runs Google's Chrome OS, it kept locking up and requiring reboots. Beta!
Easy updates. Today, much of the functionality in many hardware products is accomplished through firmware — embedded software that can be updated over the Internet after a product ships. The fact that companies can fix bugs by pushing out upgrades turns out to be a powerful temptation to ship incomplete products. (It's a little like having a college professor who lets you change your answers on an exam after you turned it in.)
I was reminded of this when I read a leaked e-mail that HP honcho Jon Rubinstein sent to his staff after the company's TouchPad tablet was released to uniformly lukewarm reviews. He acknowledged that some of the gripes were legit. And then he said that most of them would be quickly fixed in updates to the TouchPad's software and application store. He wouldn't have been nearly so blithe if it hadn't been possible for HP to go on working on the TouchPad after people were buying it in its buggy initial state.
The rush to beat the other guys. Back in February, I reviewed Ford's new 2012 Focus hatchback. At the time, the car hadn't hit dealers yet — and its release was so far off that Ford couldn't tell me when it would be available. The intense competition of the gadget world makes that sort of leisurely pace unthinkable. Product development, manufacturing, distribution and marketing happen at such a blistering pace that there's no margin for error.
RIM, for instance, shipped its BlackBerry PlayBook tablet in April, then immediately began flooding the airwaves with ads that touted it as the first "professional grade" tablet and boasted of its support for Adobe Flash. Which would have been dandy ... except that the tablet was thoroughly glitchy and sported a version of Flash that barely worked. The PlayBook's marketing campaign was ready; the PlayBook wasn't.
Like the PlayBook, nearly all the tablets that have followed Apple's iPad onto the market feel like they were designed with a sense of urgency that trumped all else. It's no coincidence that none of them have been big hits. If a serious iPad rival does come along, it won't be one that was shipped prematurely.
All of which brings me back to Apple. Heaven knows, it often ships products that don't include all the features an average consumer might want. But even when its products don't "just work" in a way that feels practically mystical, they do work. What does it say about the state of the tech industry that this comes as a refreshing surprise?
McCracken blogs about personal technology at Technologizer, which he founded in 2008 after nearly two decades as a tech journalist; on Twitter, he's @harrymccracken. His column, also called Technologizer, appears every Thursday on TIME.com.

Turkey's “Kurdish Question” Back To Center Stage After Elections And New Bloodshed

Op-Ed: By now, a resolution to Turkey’s most intractable internal conflict must include the PKK, which has both widespread popular support and blood on its hands.
Share on Facebook print
A Kurdish New Year's celebration in Istanbul (Sean David Hobbs) A Kurdish New Year's celebration in Istanbul (Sean David Hobbs)

By Ismet Berkan
HURRIYET/Worldcrunch
ISTANBUL - Sometimes it helps to discuss matters openly. Yes, the 30-year-old Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) is a terrorist organization with blood on its hands. But with that said, the PKK possesses a popular appeal among Kurds in Turkey that cannot be denied.
While the respective histories of the PKK and the Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (PDP) are different, few would argue with the fact that these two leading Kurdish parties share the same political perspective.
In the recent national elections, PDP gained undeniably strong support, garnering 6.5 percent of the voters across Turkey. In some cities in predominantly Kurdish southeastern Turkey, this support hovered around 60 percent. What is more amazing is that PDP made such a strong national showing while gaining votes from fewer than half of all possible provinces in Turkey.
It is good to look at all of these facts with an objective eye. Those who say, “the Kurdish Question is different than the PKK” are wrong. Like it or not, ‘the Kurdish Question’ and the ‘PKK problem’ are more intertwined than ever before – in essence, they have become the same question.
Imagining the PKK as just three to five thousand people with guns in the mountains, and ignoring the political support for these mountain terrorists, is the biggest mistake that could be made.
Still, violence continues. On July 14, 13 Turkish soldiers were killed in a clash with PKK militants in the southeastern Diyarbakir province. Following the attacks, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, “There is no Kurdish Problem; only a PKK Problem.” He added that “each Kurdish citizen has problems in his or her life, but the issues of Kurdish citizens in Turkey don’t have to do with the PKK.”
Separating the Kurdish Question from the PKK has been a standard view among government officials for some time. The unreliability of the PKK, the complexity of the PKK’s leadership structure, PKK leaders who contradict each other are some of the factors that can lead to a lack of trust within government circles. Government leaders may think they are taking a huge political risk by considering a working relationship with the PKK, yet the government is unable to find anyone other than the PKK to truly speak for the Kurdish people.
Two problems, one people
I understand this is a very disappointing situation for government leaders. However, what I do not understand is concluding that there is no way the PKK and the government can work together. This viewpoint takes us back to before 2005 when the government would say, “There is a Kurdish problem and the problem is the PKK,” and then exclude the PKK from any possible decision-making process for a lasting political solution for the Kurds of Turkey.
Personally, I have been trying to study closely the Kurdish problem since the 1980’s. In my opinion, there once was a possible solution for the Kurdish problem, even a solution that would have excluded a terrorist organization like the PKK. However at that time, our government was in favor of not only trying to resolve the problem without the PKK, but also without the Kurds. Since the 1980’s, the denial of the Kurds increased the growth of the Kurdish Question or Kurdish Problem, and drove Kurds to identify themselves more closely with the PKK. We have now reached a point today where people say, “Let Kurds be a part of the solution, but not the PKK.”
I believe we have reached a stage where a solution without the PKK is not possible. In fact, government leaders have realized for quite some time that the PKK needs to be a part of resolving the Kurdish Question. Since 1992, on again, off again talks have been taking place directly or indirectly between the PKK and the Turkish government. Included in all of these discussions is the condition that the PKK will finally surrender, leave their guns, come down from the mountains and become a legal organization.
Of course there is always the “other” option. The second option is simple: make no peace and unified resolution with the PKK; instead try to “liquidate” the PKK. The recent 13 martyrs that we lost this month in attacks in the southeast of Turkey, should at least remind us that we have been trying to apply this “second option” to the Kurdish Question for 30 years.
It’s up to you to make the decision: Should this Kurdish Question be resolved with the PKK or without the PKK?
Read the original article in Turkish
All rights reserved ©Worldcrunch - in partnership with Hürriyet

Police Open Fire on Spontaneous Protest in China

Police opened fire at civilians on Tuesday afternoon in southwestern China after thousands spontaneously gathered to protest of the killing of a disabled street vendor.

Similar to the riots over the mistreatment of migrant workers in southern China last month, locals had gathered in the streets upon learning that local security forces had beaten a disabled fruit vendor to death in Anshun City, in Guizhou Province.

The crowd shouted slogans accusing the government of violence. They threw rocks at shield-wielding police, and overturned government vehicles. The police answered with tear gas, high-pressure water cannons, and live fire.

Mr. Hu, a witness, said police officers with helmets, shields, and batons, along with firefighters and many police cars, arrived at the scene immediately after the crowd gathered to "maintain order."

VICTIMIZED: A street fruit vendor with only one leg was beaten to death by security forces in Anshun City, Guizhou Province. (Weibo.com)
“As the crowd shouted expletives at security force and slogans like 'Let's punish the killer!' police used water cannons to spray those on the streets and then everything turned into chaos," Hu said.

"There were many people who were being beaten by armed police. The police also used tear gas [on the crowd], and shooting was also heard. By the time the crowd receded to the sidewalks, a few people were lying on the street bleeding—not sure whether dead or alive. Nobody went rescuing them, but some people shouted: 'The police killed people!'"

An insider said among those beaten was a boy about 15 years old. After a policeman hit him on the head with a baton, he began vomiting blood and his head was bleeding. Even some pedestrians, who had nothing to do with the riot, were also beaten about the head.

"The police were insane. They beat whoever was in their way," said Ms. Wang, another witness.

"But the crowd did not give up in face of threats and horror. More people came in the evening, probably a few thousand. The crowd filled the sidewalk on either side of the street, and in response, the police also formed a human wall," Wang said. "It wasn't until after 9 p.m. that the deceased and overturned cars were pulled away."

The fuss all started out at 2 p.m., local time, when security forces began chasing the illegal vendor, an elderly man who only had one leg. When the man could not run away fast enough with his fruit cart, the police grabbed him and a few of them took turns beating him, until he fell to the ground—dead.

When The Epoch Times contacted the municipal public security bureau, it said it would not make further comments beyond the information that is already public.

Asian Ministers Tackle Mekong River Development

Environment ministers from six Asian nations are meeting in Phnom Penh to finalize how they will work together to balance economic development and environmental protection in a region that includes one of the world’s longest and most biodiverse rivers in the world.
In 2005, the nations that share the 4,800 kilometer Mekong River set up the first five-year plan to unify efforts for balance environmental protection with development and poverty reduction.

That $30-million program, with the unwieldy name of the Core Environmental Program and Biodiversity Conservation Corridors Initiative, expires in December.  The six countries in the Greater Mekong Subregion group are China, Burma, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam, and their environment ministers have endorsed, in principle, extending the program until 2016.

Formal approval of the plan is expected in December.

Senior natural resources specialist Sanath Ranawana, with the Asian Development Bank, which administers the program, explains why such talks are critical for tens of millions of people.

“The GMS, the Greater Mekong Sub-region, is an area that is growing very rapidly. And the potential for growth here is enormous; countries like China, neighboring countries such as Indonesia or India, which create a huge demand for the resources and the products from this region. And so this program is quite important and crucial for balancing what this region might do in the future, development in the future, with how it can manage its resources in a sustainable way,” Ranawana says.

The Mekong River and its tributaries are one of the richest freshwater fisheries in the world, but environmentalists warn it is increasingly under threat from pollution and new hydropower dams.

Activists dance in front of the Chinese embassy in Bangkok after delivering a letter demanding its government to stop building dams on upper Mekong river
Mar. 4 2010 (Reuters).
Environmentalists fear dams could cause significant damage to migratory fish stocks, as well as the flow of sediment that builds up and protects the Mekong Delta region in southeastern Vietnam.

The most controversial proposal is the $3.8-billion Xayaburi dam in Laos, but following pressure from downriver countries Cambodia and Vietnam, Laos officials recently said they are suspending construction.

The Mekong’s importance to Cambodia was highlighted by Prime Minister Hun Sen who told Thursday’s gathering that managing the river’s water resources is “a matter of life and death” for the people who rely on it.

Laos also sees the river as a key way to boost its impoverished economy by generating electricity from hydropower dams in this energy-hungry region.

The ADB’s Sanath Ranawana says linking energy programs with the environment forms a central plank of the second stage of the program.  It will also link the environment to investment decisions in other vital areas such as agriculture, tourism and transport.

“We have made the case, and the countries recognize very well, that environment is an integral aspect that they need to take care of," he says. "The ecosystem services that are generated from the conservation landscapes are what underpin the whole economic program, the economic development.  So agriculture, hydropower, all of the sectors that are important for economic development are based on having valuable ecosystem services.”

In Bali last week U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the annual Association of South-East Asian Nations Regional Forum that Washington is working with the ADB and the European Union to improve infrastructure and the environment in the Lower Mekong.
She also called for a pause in all new dam construction until fully assessing their environmental effects.

How We Talk War When We Talk With China Now

Admiral Mike Mullen, outgoing Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sounded a worried note in his New York Times op-ed on Tuesday on the state of Chinese-American military relations. It was a typically one-sided presentation of the situation: those spying, secretive, bullying, and increasingly well-armed Chinese versus a U.S. that's only trying to keep the regional peace... while selling arms at a record pace to every neighboring state, conducting joint naval exercises right off China's coast, and, you know, openly planning to bomb the breadth and length of the Middle Kingdom.
Details!
But these are the same old gripes that have bedeviled the bilateral military relationship for years now, keeping it frighteningly stillborn — at least relative to the immense buildup of economic connectivity between our countries in just the last decade. Admiral Mullen is right to be depressed about this uneven state of affairs, because typically it's the military-to-military relationship that's steadier than the financial one. Usually, it's the "glue" that survives the petty political flare-ups and nagging economic disagreements, but here it's the frequent victim of such squabbles and that should make both sides nervous.
Why? Besides all those trillions of U.S. dollars sitting in Beijing's coffers, there's the historic argument about how the international system always has a hard time integrating a rising global power — especially when the longtime "sole superpower" is in relative decline. (And we'll see how relative that is come default D-day.) But since America and its military actually are the force for good around this planet, we want to continue doing the right thing while asking China to step up and help — instead of just "free riding" on our global policing efforts. But because we're a rather nervous Number One right now, we want to keep a wary eye on everything China does with its military, while keeping our big-war powder dry.
In short, Washington can't make up its our mind on China — the "threat" version, anyway — and so it seeks to have it both ways by brandishing sticks and carrots. Unsurprisingly, single-party-state China returns the favor, and for some reason, that perplexes our leadership! The Pentagon finds Beijing oddly schizophrenic in the generals-to-generals realm, when, of course, Washington itself consistently presents any number of contradictory strategic personalities, talking out of all sides of its mouth at once.
Here's my rundown of the six major approaches that America currently employs to deal with Chinese military might. See if you can spot the internal inconsistencies.
1. The Knock-Off Stalemate
For some reason, the Chinese military is super-secretive. It simply doesn't want to advertize its technological and operational shortcomings to the world's uber-battle-tested military superpower. Go figure! Instead, it spends a lot of its time trying to steal Number One's best military technologies, which it then regurgitates in "new" platforms that look suspiciously like knock-offs of America's most fearsome weapons systems — like that fifth-generation stealth fighter jet that the People's Liberation Army just so happened to unveil during a recent visit by Robert Gates.
Sometimes these efforts are hilariously self-contradictory in their own right, like when the Chinese military trots out its new design for an aircraft carrier while simultaneously letting it slip that it's testing a new "carrier killer" missile. Hmm, such an inscrutable combination. Sort of like coming out with the ultimate in body armor and the latest-and-greatest in armor-piercing bullets... at the same time!
But frankly, expecting the People's Liberation Army to stop behaving in this way — so long as the Pentagon explicitly plots its future big-war capabilities against those of the Chinese — is simply unrealistic. China's military won't go transparent until it's demonstrably better than the U.S. military — a situation that's inconceivably hard to imagine given Beijing's reluctance to use its military anyway except off its shore, which gets me to America's second face....
2. The (False) Supply and (Big) Demand
Washington doesn't need a "containment" strategy for China; China sets one in motion all by its lonesome. Every time Beijing starts bullying its smaller neighbors with its unreasonable claims on the South China Sea, you can just hear the West's military-industrial complex's cash registers start ka-chinging. China's neighbors have collectively doubled their arms purchases in the last half-decade — a totally delightful tonic for an American defense industry facing tighter Pentagon budgets.
Then there's the Pentagon's new AirSea Battle Concept — basically a big-war wish list for our Navy and Air Force, both of which have long felt budgetarily slighted by the boots-on-the-ground-centric "long war" against radical Islam. Sure, at least we're transparent about our military goals (you can actually find defense think-tank maps on the Internet listing all the Chinese military facilities we plan to bomb in the opening days of the blitzkrieg-like war over Taiwan), but if your main goal here is to intimidate the Chinese military with your brilliant schemes, then why should you expect them to give in to your demands for transparency?
3. The Silent Partner
Washington doesn't want you to know this, but the biggest beneficiary of the "war on terror" has been the Chinese. We take down the Taliban and a decade later, who's made the biggest foreign direct investment in Afghanistan? The Chinese, of course, plopping $3 billion-plus of our exported capital on a giant copper mine. Then we take down Saddam in Iraq and guess whose national oil companies have contracts in both the Kurdish north and Arab south? Again, the dollar-gorged Chinese.
If you're China, you have to love the American's obsession with terrorism, because U.S. military efforts are making the world safe for Chinese resource plundering. I mean, why buy the cow when you can walk away with the milk — at zero military casualties?
4. The Cuban Confusion Crisis
Yes, we still regularly sell advanced weaponry to a small "break-away" island off China's coast. We even have a law that mandates it — in so many words. Imagine China doing the same with Cuba, or conducting naval exercises with Venezuela and Mexico in the Gulf, or conducting military spy flights along the California coast. Simply put, we do things in China's front yard that we'd never tolerate from anybody in our own, and if China pushes back at all, we label that provocative... and then sell that many more arms to all of its neighbors — you know, to keep things "balanced."
5. The Eager Engager
And, yes, we do our best to try and draw the Chinese military into cooperative engagements elsewhere in the world, like in our multinational anti-piracy effort off the coast of Somalia (touted by Mullen). We'd also like China to fix North Korea for us, and lean on Tehran regarding its nuclear efforts, and make sure north Sudan doesn't restart its civil war with fledgling South Sudan, and... the list goes on and on. We've got a lot of messes around the world where we'd like Chinese help. But guess what? When you're all worried about America's attempts to keep your military bottled up in East Asia, you kind of like the idea of Washington facing all sorts of intractable — and draining — military interventions elsewhere in the world. And so you're not at all eager to lighten America's global load.
6. The Clueless Bystander
China is easily the most active integrating agent in globalization today. Far and away, it's the most dynamic force across both Central Asia and Africa, two regions into which this "long war" will logically flow as the forces of radical Islam continue to lose and/or grow more irrelevant across the Arab world. In both instances, the level of U.S. security cooperation with the Chinese is non-existent. We set up our Africa Command and pretend we run some sort of security show there, when it's Chinese investment that's revolutionizing the socio-economic landscape. Could our "chocolate" mix with their "peanut butter"? Of course it could — to the benefit of both, but look back over the five other strategic personalities we present to the Chinese and ask yourself why Beijing should stick its neck out anywhere when the U.S. seems so intent on containing China's military rise back in Asia?
Don't expect any of this to change any time soon. Our multiple-personalities approach has long been enshrined in the diplomatic "wisdom" of "separate tracks." Simply put, Washington has no desire to engage in any significant horse-trading with Beijing. As such, expect the same mournful op-ed from the next outgoing Chairman four years hence.
We are simply too set in our ways to behave otherwise.
Esquire contributing editor Thomas P.M. Barnett is the author of Great Powers: America and the World After Bush. For his weekly video bulletins for Wikistrat, click here.
Photo Credit: Christopher Zacharow

Jabin T Jacob: When the US is in the room, China is the elephant, not India

During her visit to India for the 2nd Indo-US Strategic Dialogue, last week, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called upon India to “not just to look east, but to engage east and act east as well”. But the problem in New Delhi might well be an incapacity to ‘think east’ beyond the boundary dispute with China or trying to retain a toehold against Chinese dominance in Myanmar. What engagement there is occurs in the economic domain but India remains overcautious in its political and military outreach to the Asia-Pacific.
The bold Quadrilateral Initiative of some years ago, involving the Indian, Japanese, Australian and American navies, was given a quick burial as soon as the Chinese started issuing demarches.
Another opportunity now presents itself with the inauguration of a trilateral US-India-Japan dialogue at the ARF meeting in Indonesia, where Clinton went after her visit to India. It remains to be seen however, whether this will lead to regular joint military exercises and operations – such as anti-piracy and disaster relief, for example – and graduate quickly to heads of government-level meetings, without bowing to Chinese pressure.
Article continues below the advertisement...
The timing meanwhile, seems inspired by the fact that China has been on the diplomatic back-foot given its military aggressiveness in the South China Sea, over the last year.
Similarly, the decisions to expand Indo-US strategic talks to cover Central Asia, West Asia and Latin America as well as to engage in joint action in Africa appear to acknowledge the need to deal with increasing Chinese activity in these regions in recent years.
As the US suffers from global overreach and economic constraints, it probably sees greater merit in reaching out to like-minded partners to ensure some degree of adherence to American values and interests around the world.
During her visit, Clinton in fact, highlighted the two nations’ identities as plural and democratic societies pointing out that it was this that “sets us apart from other systems and other nations”. The problem for Indian policymakers however, is that the American emphasis on democracy and shared values changes depending on the area in question. The US has so far wanted to keep Indian presence in Afghanistan to a minimum in order not to further complicate its difficult relationship with Pakistan while in East Asia it is happy to talk about human rights and democracy targeting China with whom India in turn tries to keep its bilateral relationship on an even keel. Both, American resistance to greater Indian activity in Afghanistan, and Indian reluctance to undertake a more value-based engagement in East Asia are hypocritical and shortsighted.
Even leaving aside the issue of democratic values, it would appear that New Delhi is not interested in a realpolitik-driven approach in East Asia. Myanmar might be an exception but what explains the very low-levels of cooperation between India and Vietnam, which was the last country to fight a war with the Chinese and has a long-standing maritime dispute with them?
Despite Vietnamese interest in more robust cooperation on matters related to China, India proceeds far too slowly.
What New Delhi forgets is that the Chinese will not take such cooperation between India and China’s neighbours amiss, for it is exactly what they themselves would do and expect a nation in India’s position to do. The argument here is not to have Vietnam turn into the equivalent of what Pakistan is for the Chinese, for Hanoi is not Islamabad (or Rawalpindi). Here again, the American experience is noteworthy. Despite the legacy of the Vietnam War, the two countries have seen a warming of relations since the end of the Cold War and active engagement on China.
While Clinton acknowledged that “a strong, constructive relationship among India, the United States, and China… will not always be easy”, this also does not mean that Indo-US cooperation must go slow in deference to Chinese sensitivities. If anything, the India-Japan-US grouping must before long, expand to include Australia again, and Southeast Asian nations such as Vietnam and Indonesia. In fact, there is a case to be made for India leading the creation of such groups even without US involvement.
If as Secretary Clinton, remarked, “much of the history of the 21st century will be written in Asia”, then New Delhi will need to find the energy and resources to focus not just on its troubled western frontiers, but also on its sprawling and diverse eastern neighbourhood.
The author is Assistant Editor of the China Report, the journal of the Institute of Chinese Studies, Delhi